Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Oct;28(9):1627-1639.
doi: 10.1002/ejp.2315. Epub 2024 Jul 11.

A sham-controlled, randomized trial of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of pain in chronic pancreatitis

Helga Angela Gulisano  1 , Elin Eriksen  1 , Carsten Reidies Bjarkam  1   2 , Asbjørn Mohr Drewes  2   3 , Søren Schou Olesen  2   3
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A sham-controlled, randomized trial of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of pain in chronic pancreatitis

Helga Angela Gulisano et al. Eur J Pain. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has emerged as a treatment option for patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) who experience pain that does not respond to standard interventions. However, there is a lack of sham-controlled trials to support its efficacy.

Methods: This randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled, cross-over trial enrolled 16 CP patients with insufficient pain relief from standard therapies. Patients underwent high-frequency (1000 Hz) paraesthesia-free SCS or sham for two 10-day stimulation periods, separated by a 3-day washout period. The primary outcome was daily pain intensity registered in a pain diary based on a numeric rating scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes included various questionnaires. Quantitative sensory testing was used to probe the pain system before and after interventions.

Results: The average daily pain score on the NRS at baseline was 5.2 ± 1.9. After SCS, the pain score was 4.2 ± 2.1 compared to 4.3 ± 2.1 in the sham group (mean difference -0.1, 95% CI [-1.4 to 1.1]; P = 0.81). Similarly, no differences were observed between groups for the maximal daily pain score, secondary outcomes or quantitative sensory testing parameters. During an open-label, non-sham-controlled and non-blinded extension of the study, the average daily NRS was 5.2 ± 1.7 at baseline, 3.2 ± 1.8 at 3 months, 2.9 ± 1.9 at 6 months and 3.4 ± 2.2 at 12 months of follow-up (P = 0.001).

Conclusion: In this first sham-controlled trial of SCS in painful CP, we did not find evidence of short-term pain relief with paraesthesia-free high-frequency (1000 Hz) stimulation. However, evaluation of the long-term effect by larger sham-controlled trials with long-term follow-up is warranted.

Significance statement: In this first sham-controlled trial to apply high-frequency (1000 Hz) spinal cord stimulation in patients with visceral pain due to chronic pancreatitis, we did not find evidence for clinically relevant pain relief. Taken together with potential procedure-related complications, adverse effects and costs associated with spinal cord stimulation, our findings question its use for management of visceral pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Arendt‐Nielsen, L., Morlion, B., Perrot, S., Dahan, A., Dickenson, A., Kress, H. G., Wells, C., Bouhassira, D., & Drewes, A. M. (2018). Assessment and manifestation of central sensitisation across different chronic pain conditions. European Journal of Pain, 22, 216–241.
    1. Colloca, L. (2019). The placebo effect in pain therapies. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 59, 191–211.
    1. Dhruva, S. S., Murillo, J., Ameli, O., Morin, P. E., Spencer, D. L., Redberg, R. F., & Cohen, K. (2023). Long‐term outcomes in use of opioids, nonpharmacologic pain interventions, and Total costs of spinal cord stimulators compared with conventional medical therapy for chronic pain. JAMA Neurology, 80, 18–29.
    1. Drewes, a. M., Krarup, a. L., Detlefsen, S., Malmstrøm, M.‐L., Dimcevski, G., & Funch‐Jensen, P. (2008). Pain in chronic pancreatitis: The role of neuropathic pain mechanisms. Gut, 57, 1616–1627.
    1. Drewes, A. M., Bouwense, S. A. W., Campbell, C. M., Ceyhan, G. O., Delhaye, M., Demir, I. E., Garg, P. K., van Goor, H., Halloran, C., Isaji, S., Neoptolemos, J. P., Olesen, S. S., Palermo, T., Pasricha, P. J., Sheel, A., Shimosegawa, T., Szigethy, E., Whitcomb, D. C., & Yadav, D. (2017). Guidelines for the understanding and management of pain in chronic pancreatitis. Pancreatology, 17, 720–731.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources