Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 26:11:1421728.
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1421728. eCollection 2024.

Ultra-processed foods consumption and health-related outcomes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Adolfo Aramburu  1   2 , Giancarlo Alvarado-Gamarra  1   3 , Rubelio Cornejo  1 , Katherine Curi-Quinto  1   2 , Carmen Del Pilar Díaz-Parra  1 , Gabriela Rojas-Limache  1 , Claudio F Lanata  1   4
Affiliations

Ultra-processed foods consumption and health-related outcomes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Adolfo Aramburu et al. Front Nutr. .

Abstract

Introduction: The increase in ultra-processed foods (UPFs) intake has raised concerns about its impact on public health. Prospective observational studies have reported significant associations between higher intake of UPFs and adverse health outcomes. The aim of this study is to determine whether these associations could be confirmed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: We conducted a systematic review to analyze the evidence on the effects of UPFs intake on health. A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, LILACS, and CENTRAL up to April 22, 2024. RCTs in English, Spanish, and Portuguese evaluating the health effects of interventions to modify UPFs intake were included. The certainty of evidence was determined using the GRADE methodology.

Results: Three educational intervention studies and one controlled feeding trial were included, evaluating the effect of reducing the consumption of UPFs (455 participants, median follow-up, 12 weeks). No significant effects were observed in 30 out of the 42 outcomes evaluated. The controlled feeding trial in adults with stable weight showed a reduction in energy intake, carbohydrates, and fat (low certainty of evidence), as well as in body weight, total cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol (moderate certainty of evidence). In the educational intervention studies, a reduction in body weight and waist circumference was observed (low certainty of evidence) in women with obesity, as well as improvement in some dimensions of quality of life (very low certainty of evidence). No significant changes were observed in children and adolescents with obesity, while in overweight pregnant women, the consumption of UPFs was not reduced, so the observed benefits could be attributed to other components of the intervention.

Conclusion: Interventions aimed at reducing the consumption of UPFs showed benefits on some anthropometric and dietary intake outcomes, although significant effects were not observed for most of the evaluated outcomes. The limited number and significant methodological limitations of the studies prevent definitive conclusions. Further well-designed and conducted RCTs are needed to understand the effects of UPF consumption on health.Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023469984.

Keywords: diet; food consumption; non-communicable diseases; processed food; systematic review; ultra-processed foods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the study selection process according to PRISMA 2020.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Summary of risk of bias.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Vitale M, Costabile G, Testa R, D’Abbronzo G, Nettore IC, Macchia PE, et al. . Ultra-processed foods and human health: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Adv Nutr. (2024) 15:100121. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.09.009, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang Z, Lu C, Cui L, Fenfen E, Shang W, Wang Z, et al. . Consumption of ultra-processed foods and multiple health outcomes: an umbrella study of meta-analyses. Food Chem. (2024) 434:137460. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137460, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mambrini SP, Menichetti F, Ravella S, Pellizzari M, De Amicis R, Foppiani A, et al. . Ultra-processed food consumption and incidence of obesity and Cardiometabolic risk factors in adults: a systematic review of prospective studies. Nutrients. (2023) 15:2583. doi: 10.3390/nu15112583, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Levy RB, Moubarac J-C, Louzada ML, Rauber F, et al. . Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them. Public Health Nutr. (2019) 22:936–41. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018003762, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dicken SJ, Qamar S, Batterham RL. Who consumes ultra-processed food? A systematic review of sociodemographic determinants of ultra-processed food consumption from nationally representative samples. Nutr Res Rev. (2023):1–41. doi: 10.1017/S0954422423000240, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources