Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 26:11:1405073.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1405073. eCollection 2024.

Willingness to vaccinate and willingness to pay for vaccination against peste des petits ruminants in northern Senegal

Affiliations

Willingness to vaccinate and willingness to pay for vaccination against peste des petits ruminants in northern Senegal

Guy Sidwatta Ilboudo et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

Background: This study was carried out in Linguere department, Louga region of Senegal. Its objective was to explore the socio-economic factors that influence small ruminant producers' decisions on vaccination against peste des petits ruminants.

Methods: We carried out a willingness to vaccinate and willingness to pay for vaccination using a choice experiment approach with 200 small ruminant producers.

Results: Results showed that the key factors that influence willingness to vaccinate, include perceived benefits of vaccination (98, 95%CI: 96-100%), the type of vaccinator (91, 95%CI: 87-95%), the access to information (86, 95%CI: 81-91%), the vaccine availability (80, 95%CI: 74-86%), and the possession of a vaccination certificate by the producer (76, 95%CI: 70-82%). Preferences of producers leaned toward home vaccination (preference weight = 0.74, p = 1%), individual herd vaccination (preference weight = 0.45, p = 1%), elective participation to vaccination (preference weight = 0.33, p = 0.01), and low-cost services (preference weight = -0.004, p = 0.1). Producers expressed a willingness to pay for vaccination per animal of XOF 184 (USD 0.3), XOF 113 (USD 0.18), and XOF 82 (USD 0.13) for home, individual herd, and elective vaccination, respectively.

Conclusion: The findings underscore the importance of targeted awareness campaigns and bringing vaccination services closer to the producers.

Keywords: Senegal; choice experiment; goat; sheep; vaccination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study area mapping.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example of a choice set options presented to producers.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of herd size and number of years in small ruminants keeping.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Distribution of estimated PPR morbidity and mortality rate reported by the respondents.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Influence of various factors on the decision to vaccinate.

References

    1. MEPA . Plan national stratégique pour le contrôle et l’éradication de la peste des petits ruminants (PNS-PPR) (2018). 56 p.
    1. ANSD . Situation Economique et Sociale du Sénégal Ed. Agence Nationale de la Statistique et de la Démographie (ANSD). (2022)
    1. Kwiatek O, Minet C, Grillet C, Hurard C, Carlsson E, Karimov B, et al. . Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) outbreak in Tajikistan. J Comp Pathol. (2007) 136:111–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2006.12.002, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. OIE, FAO . Peste des Petits ruminants global eradication Programme: Contributing to food security, poverty alleviation and resilience. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH). (2016).
    1. Ledrapier P. Vers une optimisation de la couverture vaccinale contre la Peste des Petits Ruminants (PPR): approche participative de la perception de la vaccination dans la région du Ferlo au Sénégal. Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse (2018).

LinkOut - more resources