Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 11;19(7):e0298503.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298503. eCollection 2024.

Intolerance of uncertainty does not significantly predict decisions about delayed, probabilistic rewards: A failure to replicate Luhmann, C. C., Ishida, K., & Hajcak, G. (2011)

Affiliations

Intolerance of uncertainty does not significantly predict decisions about delayed, probabilistic rewards: A failure to replicate Luhmann, C. C., Ishida, K., & Hajcak, G. (2011)

Pedro L Cobos et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) is thought to lead to maladaptive behaviours and dysfunctional decision making, both in the clinical and healthy population. The seminal study reported by Luhmann and collaborators in 2011 showed that IU was negatively associated with choosing a delayed, but more certain and valuable, reward over choosing an immediate, but less certain and valuable, reward. These findings have been widely disseminated across the field of personality and individual differences because of their relevance to understand the role of IU in maladaptive behaviours in anxiety-related disorders. We conducted a study to replicate and extend Luhmann et al.'s results with a sample of 313 participants, which exceeded the size necessary (N = 266) to largely improve the statistical power of the original study by using the small telescopes approach. The results of our well powered study strongly suggest that the relationship between IU and the tendency to prefer an immediate, but less certain and less valuable reward is virtually negligible. Consequently, although this relationship cannot be definitely discarded, we conclude that it cannot be detected with Luhmann et al.'s (2011) decision-making task.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Nor do any of the funding institutions have conflicting interests.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Sequence of the decision-making task.
Left: Trial in which the immediate choice is selected, but no reward is won. Centre: Trial in which the delayed choice is selected, and the reward is won. Right: Check trial to monitor the participant’s engagement, in which an appropriate response is provided, and the reward is won.

Update of

References

    1. Carleton R. N. Into the unknown: A review and synthesis of contemporary models involving uncertainty. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2016;39:30–43. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.02.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grenier S. Barrette A. M., & Ladouceur R. Intolerance of uncertainty and intolerance of ambiguity: Similarities and differences. Personality and Individual Differences. 2005;39:593–600. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.014 - DOI
    1. Grupe D. W. & Nitschke J. B. Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety: an integrated neurobiological and psychological perspective. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2013;14:488–501. doi: 10.1038/nrn3524 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boswell J. F., Thompson-Hollands J., Farchione T. J., & Barlow D. H. Intolerance of uncertainty: A common factor in the treatment of emotional disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2013;69:630–645. doi: 10.1002/jclp.21965 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carleton R. N. The intolerance of uncertainty construct in the context of anxiety disorders: Theoretical and practical perspectives. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics. 2012;12:937–947. doi: 10.1586/ern.12.82 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources