Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 21:8:e54097.
doi: 10.2196/54097.

Machine Learning Model for Anesthetic Risk Stratification for Gynecologic and Obstetric Patients: Cross-Sectional Study Outlining a Novel Approach for Early Detection

Affiliations

Machine Learning Model for Anesthetic Risk Stratification for Gynecologic and Obstetric Patients: Cross-Sectional Study Outlining a Novel Approach for Early Detection

Feng-Fang Tsai et al. JMIR Form Res. .

Abstract

Background: Preoperative evaluation is important, and this study explored the application of machine learning methods for anesthetic risk classification and the evaluation of the contributions of various factors. To minimize the effects of confounding variables during model training, we used a homogenous group with similar physiological states and ages undergoing similar pelvic organ-related procedures not involving malignancies.

Objective: Data on women of reproductive age (age 20-50 years) who underwent gestational or gynecological surgery between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2021, were obtained from the National Taiwan University Hospital Integrated Medical Database.

Methods: We first performed an exploratory analysis and selected key features. We then performed data preprocessing to acquire relevant features related to preoperative examination. To further enhance predictive performance, we used the log-likelihood ratio algorithm to generate comorbidity patterns. Finally, we input the processed features into the light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) model for training and subsequent prediction.

Results: A total of 10,892 patients were included. Within this data set, 9893 patients were classified as having low anesthetic risk (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score of 1-2), and 999 patients were classified as having high anesthetic risk (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score of >2). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the proposed model was 0.6831.

Conclusions: By combining comorbidity information and clinical laboratory data, our methodology based on the LightGBM model provides more accurate predictions for anesthetic risk classification.

Trial registration: Research Ethics Committee of the National Taiwan University Hospital 202204010RINB; https://www.ntuh.gov.tw/RECO/Index.action.

Keywords: ASA classification; American Society of Anesthesiologists; anesthetic risk; artificial intelligence; clinical laboratory data; comorbidity; early detection; gestational; gradient boosting machine; gynecological and obstetric procedure; gynecology; laboratory data; machine learning; machine learning model; obstetrics; physiological; preoperative evaluation; risk; risk classification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proposed model system architecture. ICD-10: International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision; LightGBM: light gradient boosting machine; NTUH-iMD: National Taiwan University Hospital Integrated Medical Database.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Precision-recall-F1-score curve with different dimensions of the comorbidity vector.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Network visualization of comorbidities associated with anesthesia risk.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Receiver operating characteristic curve for each model. MLP: multilayer perceptron; SVM: support vector machine.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hackett NJ, De Oliveira GS, Jain UK, Kim JYS. ASA class is a reliable independent predictor of medical complications and mortality following surgery. Int J Surg. 2015;18:184–190. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.079. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1743-9191(15)00206-X S1743-9191(15)00206-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lupei MI, Chipman JG, Beilman GJ, Oancea SC, Konia MR. The association between ASA status and other risk stratification models on postoperative intensive care unit outcomes. Anesth Analg. 2014;118(5):989–994. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000187.00000539-201405000-00019 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benesch C, Glance LG, Derdeyn CP, Fleisher LA, Holloway RG, Messé SR, Mijalski C, Nelson MT, Power M, Welch BG. Perioperative neurological evaluation and management to lower the risk of acute stroke in patients undergoing noncardiac, nonneurological surgery: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Circulation. 2021;143(19):e923–e946. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000968. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000968?url_ver... - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wijeysundera DN. Predicting outcomes: is there utility in risk scores? Can J Anaesth. 2016;63(2):148–158. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0537-2.10.1007/s12630-015-0537-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Visnjevac O, Davari-Farid S, Lee J, Pourafkari L, Arora P, Dosluoglu HH, Nader ND. The effect of adding functional classification to ASA status for predicting 30-day mortality. Anesth Analg. 2015;121(1):110–116. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000740.00000539-201507000-00019 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources