Duration of Induction of Labor for Second-Trimester Medication Abortion and Adverse Outcomes
- PMID: 38991214
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005663
Duration of Induction of Labor for Second-Trimester Medication Abortion and Adverse Outcomes
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the relationship between duration of labor during second-trimester medication abortion and adverse outcomes.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all individuals with a singleton gestation undergoing second-trimester medication abortion without evidence of advanced cervical dilation, rupture of membranes, or preterm labor at four centers. The primary exposure was duration of labor (ie, hours spent from receiving misoprostol to fetal expulsion). The primary outcome was composite morbidity , defined as uterine rupture, need for blood transfusion, clinical chorioamnionitis, intensive care unit admission, or need for readmission. We performed bivariate and multivariate negative binomial analyses. A post hoc subgroup analysis was performed to assess for the risk of the primary outcome by gestational age. We performed tests of homogeneity based on history of uterine scarring and parity.
Results: Six hundred eighty-one individuals were included. The median duration of labor was 11 hours (interquartile range 8-17 hours). One hundred thirty-one (19.2%) experienced the primary outcome. When duration of labor was evaluated continuously, a longer duration of labor was associated with an increased frequency of morbidity (adjusted β=0.68, 95% CI, 0.32-1.04). When duration of labor was evaluated categorically, those experiencing the highest quartile of duration (ie, 17 hours or more) had a statistically higher risk for experiencing morbidity compared with individuals in all other quartiles (adjusted relative risk 1.99, 95% CI, 1.34-2.96). When we focused on components of the composite outcome, clinical chorioamnionitis was significantly different between those experiencing a longer duration and those experiencing a shorter duration of labor (26.2% vs 10.6%, P <.001). On subgroup analysis, gestational age was not associated with the risk of composite morbidity. Tests of homogeneity demonstrated no significant difference in the risk for morbidity among individuals with a history of uterine scarring or based on parity.
Conclusion: Duration of labor was independently associated with risks for adverse maternal outcomes during second-trimester medication abortion, specifically clinical chorioamnionitis.
Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Financial Disclosure Ashish Premkumar is a scientific consultant for GenBioPro. Laura Laursen indicated that this article includes unlabeled/investigational uses of misoprostol for induction of labor. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Kortsmit K, Nguyen AT, Mandel MG, Clark E, Hollier LM, Rodenhizer J, et al. Abortion surveillance—United States, 2020. MMWR Surveill Summ 2022;71:1–27. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7110a1 - DOI
-
- Gregory ECW, Valenzuela CP, Hoyert DL. Fetal mortality: United States, 2020. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2022;71:1–20. doi: 10.15620/cdc:118420 - DOI
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. WONDER online database, fetal death records 2005-2021. Accessed April 11, 2023. http://wonder.cdc.gov/fetal-deaths-current.html
-
- Autry AM, Hayes EC, Jacobson GF, Kirby RS. A comparison of medical induction and dilation and evacuation for second-trimester abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:393–7. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.123887 - DOI
-
- Bryant AG, Grimes DA, Garrett JM, Stuart GS. Second-trimester abortion for fetal anomalies or fetal death: labor induction compared with dilation and evacuation. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:788–92. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820c3d26 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical