Quality measures in primary care skin cancer management: a qualitative study of the views of key informants
- PMID: 38991668
- PMCID: PMC11243125
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080670
Quality measures in primary care skin cancer management: a qualitative study of the views of key informants
Abstract
Objectives: This study explored potential quality measures to improve skin cancer management in primary care settings, and the barriers and facilitators associated with their implementation.
Design: Semistructured interviews and qualitative proforma surveys were conducted with skin cancer experts from a range of healthcare settings. Framework analysis was employed to identify key groups of quality measures within the domains of the Donabedian model of healthcare quality (structure, process, outcome). Interview and survey data were triangulated to identify common groups of quality measures, barriers and facilitators.
Participants: We purposively recruited skin cancer experts from Australia and internationally with knowledge and experience in skin cancer management. The final sample consisted of 15 participants who had clinical or academic backgrounds.
Results: Participants unequivocally expressed the need for quality measures to guide skin cancer care. Ten groups of quality measures were identified: three groups related to the structural elements of care (eg, diagnostic tools), four related to the processes of care (eg, diagnostic process) and three related to outcomes of care (eg, treatment outcomes). Implementation barriers included clinician resistance, system inadequacies and external factors (eg, patient risk). Facilitators included incentives, education, agreed and feasible indicators and support and guidance.
Conclusions: To service a growing population of skin cancer patients in Australia, the role of primary care needs to be more clearly specified, and its care providers supported and more engaged in quality improvement processes. Structure, process and outcome quality measures, derived from detailed guidance for primary care settings, can be used to track practitioner performance and facilitate ongoing improvement.
Keywords: MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING; Patient Satisfaction; Physicians; Primary Health Care; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: DW is a member of the National Skin Cancer Centres board of directors.
Similar articles
-
User and Developer Views on Using AI Technologies to Facilitate the Early Detection of Skin Cancers in Primary Care Settings: Qualitative Semistructured Interview Study.JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jan 28;11:e60653. doi: 10.2196/60653. JMIR Cancer. 2025. PMID: 39874580 Free PMC article.
-
The Experience and Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners in Orthopaedic Settings: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(42 Suppl):1-22. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-249. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 27820153
-
Barriers and facilitators affecting the implementation of substance use screening in primary care clinics: a qualitative study of patients, providers, and staff.Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2018 Apr 9;13(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13722-018-0110-8. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2018. PMID: 29628018 Free PMC article.
-
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460. Health Technol Assess. 2020. PMID: 32975190 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38873396 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Acceptability, feasibility, and program outcomes of an equity-focused, adapted community-based healthy lifestyle program for children, young people, and their families in Perth, Western Australia: an implementation hybrid research protocol.Front Health Serv. 2025 Jul 17;5:1604809. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1604809. eCollection 2025. Front Health Serv. 2025. PMID: 40747434 Free PMC article.
-
Excision margins and prognosis in cutaneous melanoma: retrospective population-based cohort study.BJS Open. 2025 May 7;9(3):zraf042. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf042. BJS Open. 2025. PMID: 40331740 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . Cancer in Australia 2021. Canberra: AIHW; 2021. [2-Sep-2023]. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/cancer/cancer-in-australia-2021/summary Available. accessed.
-
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . Skin Cancer in Australia. Canberra: AIHW; 2016. [5-Aug-2023]. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/cancer/skin-cancer-in-australia/summary Available. accessed.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical