Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 11;15(1):5834.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49400-z.

A scalable and cGMP-compatible autologous organotypic cell therapy for Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa

Affiliations

A scalable and cGMP-compatible autologous organotypic cell therapy for Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa

Gernot Neumayer et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

We present Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa Cell Therapy (DEBCT), a scalable platform producing autologous organotypic iPS cell-derived induced skin composite (iSC) grafts for definitive treatment. Clinical-grade manufacturing integrates CRISPR-mediated genetic correction with reprogramming into one step, accelerating derivation of COL7A1-edited iPS cells from patients. Differentiation into epidermal, dermal and melanocyte progenitors is followed by CD49f-enrichment, minimizing maturation heterogeneity. Mouse xenografting of iSCs from four patients with different mutations demonstrates disease modifying activity at 1 month. Next-generation sequencing, biodistribution and tumorigenicity assays establish a favorable safety profile at 1-9 months. Single cell transcriptomics reveals that iSCs are composed of the major skin cell lineages and include prominent holoclone stem cell-like signatures of keratinocytes, and the recently described Gibbin-dependent signature of fibroblasts. The latter correlates with enhanced graftability of iSCs. In conclusion, DEBCT overcomes manufacturing and safety roadblocks and establishes a reproducible, safe, and cGMP-compatible therapeutic approach to heal lesions of DEB patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

K.T. is CEO of iPeace, Inc. M.W. is a scientific advisor for iPeace, Inc. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Optimized editing of the COL7A1 Colorado mutation (7485 + 5 G > A).
a Overview of single-step editing/reprogramming. b Overview of the Colorado mutation (red) and ssODNs (4 silent mutations (blue); wild-type sequence (green)) used for gene editing. sgRNAs (C1–C6) engage 6 possible PAMs that mediate cutting via CRISPR/CAS9. c Absolute CRISPR/CAS9 cutting efficiencies in CO2 patient fibroblasts as mediated by sgRNA C1–C6 (n = 6 biological replicates; mean and SD are shown with individual data points overlayed as scatter plot). d Relative CRISPR/CAS9 cutting efficiencies of the homozygous (CO2), heterozygous (DEB125) Colorado or wild-type allele as mediated by sgRNA C2 or C4 in indicated patient fibroblasts (n = 6 biological replicates, except wild-type sgRNA C2 n = 5; mean and SD are shown with individual data points overlayed as scatter plot). c, d Statistical significances calculated via two-tailed homoscedastic t tests (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, n.s. not significant; P values: c C1/C2 2.3E-08, C2/C3 1.8E-08, C1/C3 1.1E-01, C4/C5 2.6E-06, C5/C6 1.4E-01, C4/C6 1.9E-05, C2/C4 8.7E-02; d C2: wt/125 1.3E-02, wt/CO2 1.9E-05, 125/CO2 7.3E-03; C4: wt/125 5.5E-05, wt/CO2 1.2E-08, 125/CO2 6.2E-06). e COL7A1 editing efficiencies measured by ddPCR in CO2 primary patient fibroblasts after transfection with ssODNs and sgRNA/CAS9-containing RNPs as indicated. A bi-allelic locus (green) is used as a reference for calculating COL7A1 editing (blue) efficiencies. Ctrls omitted sgRNAs. f Agarose gels visualizing 77 E. coli colony PCRs detecting edited, Topo-cloned COL7A1 alleles from cells treated as in (e) with ssODN/sgRNA combinations as indicated (see Supplementary Fig. 1 for remaining ssODN/sgRNA combinations). A primer specific for silent mutations (b) only yields PCR products of edited alleles (asterisks). DNA size references were run in most left (top/bottom) and right (top) lanes (100–2000 bp ranges shown). g Summary of COL7A1 editing efficiencies achieved with different ssODN/sgRNA combinations as measured by ddPCR (e) or by Topo cloning of individual alleles (f). Mono-allelic edits were assumed for calculations (see discussion). h Sanger sequencing traces of unedited and edited alleles from (panel f and Supplementary Fig. 1h). Asterisks indicate integration of intended silent mutations (blue) and repair of the pathogenic mutation (green). Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Panel a created with BioRender.com released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International license.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Successful single manufacturing step editing/reprogramming of patients CO1, CO2, & DEB125.
a COL7A1 editing efficiencies measured by ddPCR in CO1 and CO2 patient fibroblasts after transfection with ssODN(+) and RNPs containing sgRNA C4 and high-fidelity CAS9 HiFi or SpyFi as indicated. A bi-allelic locus (green) is used as a reference for calculating COL7A1 editing (blue) efficiencies, assuming mono-allelic editing events. Ctrls omitted sgRNAs. b Reproducible COL7A1 editing in CO2 patient fibroblasts (as in (a)) with SpyFi CAS9 (n = biological replicates as indicated; mean and SEM are shown). c ddPCR screen of 64 single-step edited/reprogrammed iPS cell lines derived from patient CO1 fibroblasts. Ratios of edited COL7A1 alleles (blue) and a bi-allelic reference locus (green) are used to identify mono- (0.5 + /−0.19) or bi-allelic (1.0 + /−0.19) editing events (black values; red values below/above cutoff indicate mixed or incorrectly edited clones; see Supplementary Fig. 4). d, e Agarose gels visualizing PCR amplicons of a 731 bp (d) and 2418 bp (e) sequence surrounding the edited COL7A1 locus from single-step edited/reprogrammed iPS cell lines derived from three patients. Note some samples yield 2 PCR products, indicative of InDels on one of the COL7A1 alleles. InDels can be substantial (e.g., line CO2-65(B)), so they are only included on bigger (e) PCR products. DNA size references were run in most left (d, e) and right (d) lanes; 100–15,000 bp (d) or 1500–15,000 bp (e) range is shown. f Sanger sequencing of the smaller PCR product from line CO2-65(B) from (e) reveals a large 654 bp deletion. g Summary of single-step editing/reprogramming screens conducted with sgRNA C4/ssODN(+) from three patients as indicated (top). Topo cloning and sanger sequencing of PCR products (df) confirm correct COL7A1 editing on target alleles in 15 of 17 single-step edited/reprogrammed iPS cell lines. h Immunofluorescence microscopy images of iPS cells and parental fibroblasts stained for pluripotency markers TRA-1-81 and NANOG from three patients. DAPI visualized DNA, scale indicated. i Summary of flow cytometry analysis of iPS cells from three patients for CD90 and the pluripotency marker TRA-1-60 (see Supplementary Fig. 3d). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Generation of organotypic skin grafts at clinical scale.
a Uniform manifold approximation projection (UMAP) of integrated scRNA-seq of H9 ES cell differentiation towards iSCs on Day 7 reveals three lineages: ectoderm (orange), mesoderm (blue), and neuroectoderm (green). b Violin plots depicting relative expression (RPKM) of representative ectoderm, mesoderm and neuroectoderm genes across scRNA-seq clusters. c ITGA6 expression analyzed via RNA-seq in H9 ES cells during iSC differentiation. Time points as indicated (D: day; n = 2 biological replicates; NHKs used as positive control n = 1). d Flow cytometry of day 45 unsorted H9 ES cells. Cells double positive for ITGA6HI PE (y-axis) and K14HI FITC (x axis) are in high gate (red) and lower ITGA6/K14LOW expressing cells are in low gate (blue); expression of K18 (PER-CP; x axis) in subpopulations (right). n = 1. e Bright-field image (top left) of FACS sorted ITGA6HI H9 ES cell-derived iSCs expanded and used for organotypic stratification (top right). Note normal polarization and stratification; Collagen 7 (green), Involucrin (red), DAPI (blue); additional images, K14, K10 (red). Bright-field image (bottom left) of unsorted H9 ES cell-derived iSCs used for organotypic stratification (bottom right). Note disorganized layering and stratification. n = 1, scale indicated. f iPS cell to iSC differentiation strategy employing cell enrichment via AutoMACS pro-separator, following a defined cGMP-compatible protocol. g Flow cytometry analysis of % ITGA6 positivity measured before and after AutoMACS enrichment. h % Coupling efficiency (CE) determined by the equation (5) %CE= live sorted iSCs/iPS cell input*100. g, h Data from five independent differentiated patient cell lines (n = indicated; mean, SEM;). i UMAPs of integrated scRNA-seq data from five patient- and H9 ES-derived iSCs post-ITGA6 enrichment and in vitro expansion reveal 8 clusters (C1–C8) comprising the DEBCT product. j Individual UMAP plots from overlaid scRNA-seq datasets from (i) with color scheme as indicated. Four ectoderm (C1, C2, C4, C7), 3 mesoderm (C3, C8, C5), and 1 melanocyte/neuroectoderm-derived (C6) clusters were identified. C5/C8 clusters indicated by dotted outline were present at variable quantities (see text, Fig. 5 and Supplementary Fig. 7). Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Panel f created with BioRender.com released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International license.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Genomic and chromosomal stability.
a Normal karyotypes in 10 of 11 iPS cell lines from four patients. b k-means clustering of all variants (n = 111,741) found by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in fibroblasts, iPS cells and iSCs from patient DEB125 (see Supplementary Data 2). Red frame highlights a sub-set with differential allele frequencies (AFs) in iPS cells/iSCs compared to fibroblasts. Boxes: interquartile ranges (25–75%), center lines: medians, whiskers: 1.5 times the interquartile range; outliers: circles. c Cutoff/odds ratio filtering (see Methods) identifies variants from WGS (red: SNPs; green: InDels) specifically found in cell types from indicated patient lines. Grouping in Venn diagrams indicates the absence of positive variant selection. The majority of cell-type-specific variants is found in intergenic or intronic sequences (pie charts). No gene ontology (GO) term enrichment detected. d Aligning all shared iPS cell/iSC-specific variants with the used seed sequence of sgRNA C4 within a 25 bp search window that must contain a NRG PAM-motif does not identify any homologies. The outlier (circles) with the highest similarity exhibits six mismatches. Boxes: interquartile ranges (25%–75%), center lines: medians, whiskers: 1.5 times the interquartile range. e TIDE analysis of sgRNA C4-mediated CAS9 cutting in CO2 fibroblasts at the COL7A1 on-target (top) and the in silico predicted off-target NOTCH1 (bottom). Measurements taken upstream (Ctrl) and downstream of cut sites. f Plots of normalized WGS coverage 1000 bp up-/downstream of COL7A1 (top) and NOTCH1 (bottom) from fibroblasts/iPS cells. Note the sharp drop of coverage at the COL7A1 locus in iPS cells due to a heterozygous 654 bp deletion (Fig. 2d–g). g Summary of all in silico predicted exonic and intronic off-targets as in (e, f). For TIDE (middle), controls were subtracted from cut sites. Heterozygous 1 bp, 10 bp, and 654 bp COL7A1-deletions were detected via WGS coverage (right; see Supplementary Data 3) in iPS cells/iSCs from homozygous patients. h Variants identified via the STAMPv2 oncopanel. Germline variants (green) are found in all 3 cell types. A heterozygous androgen receptor mutation (red) stems from clonal expansion of a fibroblast subpopulation (3%) with this lesion. Blue: variants identified by secondary methods. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Patient iPS cell-derived organotypic skin grafts survive in mice with a favorable safety profile.
a Summary of mouse graft success determined by IF staining of basement marker Collagen 7 and granular marker involucrin (IVL) at 1 month. b Representative IF image of DEB125-1 derived iSC graft at 1 month. Keratin K14, K10, Involucrin (red), Collagen 7 (COL7; green), DAPI (blue). c Quantification (%) of 8 different cell-type clusters (C1–C8) comprising the DEBCT product and identified via individual scRNA sequencing (see Fig. 3). d Strong positive correlation between % graft success rate (a) and average C5/C8 cluster expression as quantified by scRNA sequencing. e Representative flow cytometry plots analyzing cell composition of DEB125-1 iSCs labeled for ITGB4 and CD90/Thy1 before grafting onto mice. f Quantification via flow cytometry of the average expanded iSC cell composition prior to grafting (n = number of biological replicates as indicated; mean and SEM are shown). g Overview of method for detection of evading iSCs into mouse organs using human-specific Alu-qPCR. h Table summarizing Alu-qPCR-based biodistribution and histology-based tumor detection results from mice at 1, 3, 6, and 9 month post iSC grafting. i Representative Alu-qPCR from organs of DEB125-1 derived iSC grafted mice at indicated time points. LOD is level of detectability in tissues spiked with human DNA from TERT keratinocytes (n = number of biological replicates as indicated; mean and SEM are shown). j qRT-PCR detection of pluripotency marker expression (LIN28A, NANOG, OCT4 and SOX2) in the iSC product. H9 ES cells and TERT keratinocytes (KC) were used as controls (n = 3 technical replicates; mean and SEM are shown). Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Panel g created with BioRender.com released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International license.

Update of

References

    1. Magrin E, Miccio A, Cavazzana M. Lentiviral and genome-editing strategies for the treatment of beta-hemoglobinopathies. Blood. 2019;134:1203–1213. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019000949. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tucci F, Galimberti S, Naldini L, Valsecchi MG, Aiuti A. A systematic review and meta-analysis of gene therapy with hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells for monogenic disorders. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:1315. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28762-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee, A., Xu, J., Wen, Z. & Jin, P. Across dimensions: developing 2D and 3D human iPSC-based models of fragile X syndrome. Cells 11, 1725 (2022). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomas D, Choi S, Alamana C, Parker KK, Wu JC. Cellular and engineered organoids for cardiovascular models. Circ. Res. 2022;130:1780–1802. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.320305. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Trush O, Takasato M. Kidney organoid research: current status and applications. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2022;75:101944. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2022.101944. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources