Clinical Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Diagnosis of Central Nervous System Infections: Advances and Challenges
- PMID: 38992308
- PMCID: PMC11660858
- DOI: 10.1007/s40291-024-00727-9
Clinical Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Diagnosis of Central Nervous System Infections: Advances and Challenges
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) infections carry a substantial burden of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and accurate and timely diagnosis is required to optimize management. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has proven to be a valuable tool in detecting pathogens in patients with suspected CNS infection. By sequencing microbial nucleic acids present in a patient's cerebrospinal fluid, brain tissue, or samples collected outside of the CNS, such as plasma, mNGS can detect a wide range of pathogens, including rare, unexpected, and/or fastidious organisms. Furthermore, its target-agnostic approach allows for the identification of both known and novel pathogens. This is particularly useful in cases where conventional diagnostic methods fail to provide an answer. In addition, mNGS can detect multiple microorganisms simultaneously, which is crucial in cases of mixed infections without a clear predominant pathogen. Overall, clinical mNGS testing can help expedite the diagnostic process for CNS infections, guide appropriate management decisions, and ultimately improve clinical outcomes. However, there are key challenges surrounding its use that need to be considered to fully leverage its clinical impact. For example, only a few specialized laboratories offer clinical mNGS due to the complexity of both the laboratory methods and analysis pipelines. Clinicians interpreting mNGS results must be aware of both false negatives-as mNGS is a direct detection modality and requires a sufficient amount of microbial nucleic acid to be present in the sample tested-and false positives-as mNGS detects environmental microbes and their nucleic acids, despite best practices to minimize contamination. Additionally, current costs and turnaround times limit broader implementation of clinical mNGS. Finally, there is uncertainty regarding the best practices for clinical utilization of mNGS, and further work is needed to define the optimal patient population(s), syndrome(s), and time of testing to implement clinical mNGS.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Figures
 
              
              
              
              
                
                
                 
              
              
              
              
                
                
                References
- 
    - Robertson FC et al. Epidemiology of central nervous system infectious diseases: a meta-analysis and systematic review with implications for neurosurgeons worldwide. J. Neurosurg 130, 1107–1126 (2018). - PubMed
 
- 
    - Vetter P, Schibler M, Herrmann JL & Boutolleau D Diagnostic challenges of central nervous system infection: extensive multiplex panels versus stepwise guided approach. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis 26, 706–712 (2020). - PubMed
 
- 
    - Weidauer S, Wagner M, Enkirch SJ & Hattingen E CNS Infections in Immunoincompetent Patients : Neuroradiological and Clinical Features. Clin. Neuroradiol 30, 9–25 (2020). - PubMed
 
 
        