Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 25;128(29):7199-7207.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c01086. Epub 2024 Jul 11.

Modulating Weak Protein-Protein Cross-Interactions by the Addition of Free Amino Acids at Millimolar Concentrations

Affiliations

Modulating Weak Protein-Protein Cross-Interactions by the Addition of Free Amino Acids at Millimolar Concentrations

Pamina M Winkler et al. J Phys Chem B. .

Abstract

In this paper, we quantify weak protein-protein interactions in solution using cross-interaction chromatography (CIC) and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and demonstrate that they can be modulated by the addition of millimolar concentrations of free amino acids. With CIC, we determined the second osmotic virial cross-interaction coefficient (B23) as a proxy for the interaction strength between two different proteins. We perform SPR experiments to establish the binding affinity between the same proteins. With CIC, we show that the amino acids proline, glutamine, and arginine render the protein cross-interactions more repulsive or equivalently less attractive. Specifically, we measured B23 between lysozyme (Lys) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) and between Lys and protein isolates (whey and canola). We find that B23 increases when amino acids are added to the solution even at millimolar concentrations, corresponding to protein/ligand stoichiometric ratios as low as 1:1. With SPR, we show that the binding affinity between proteins can change by 1 order of magnitude when 10 mM glutamine is added. In the case of Lys and one whey protein isolate (WPI), it changes from the mM to the M range, thus by 3 orders of magnitude. Interestingly, this efficient modulation of the protein cross-interactions does not alter the protein's secondary structure. The capacity of amino acids to modulate protein cross-interactions at mM concentrations is remarkable and may have an impact across fields in particular for specific applications in the food or pharmaceutical industries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Characteristic elution profiles measured by the CIC approach monitoring the interactions of Lys-BSA (purple) in comparison to the self-interacting Lys-Lys (black) (A) and of Lys-WPI BLG (blue), Lys-WPI ALAC (green), and Lys-CPI NAP (orange) in comparison to the self-interacting Lys-Lys (dash-dotted black line) (B) in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH ∼ 6.9.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Change of B23B23) for the interaction between lysozyme grafted to the column and BSA (at 20 mg/mL) in the presence of added proline dissolved in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH ∼ 6.9. The error bars reflect the measurement uncertainties (std of ΔB23).
Figure 3
Figure 3
ΔB23 for the interaction between lysozyme, grafted to the column, and the two whey protein isolates, WPI BLG (circles) and WPI ALAC (squares), and the canola protein isolate, CPI NAP (triangles), is displayed for different amino acids (arginine (blue), glutamine (green), and proline (red)) at 1–100 mM dissolved in the protein injected and in the 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH ∼ 6.9. The error bars reflect the measurement uncertainties (std of ΔB23).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Normalized CD curves for the individual proteins of lysozyme (A) and WPI BLG (B) at ∼25 μM and for the interacting Lys-WPI BLG sample (C) at ∼50 μM in buffer and in the presence of 1 mM proline and 10 mM proline and 10 mM glutamine. In (D), the calculated wavelength (λ) ratio between the CD signal measured at λ = 222 nm versus λ = 208 nm for the Lys and WPI BLG measured separately and together in buffer solutions (gray) and in the presence of 1 mM proline (light green) and 10 mM proline (dark green) and 10 mM glutamine (orange).
Figure 5
Figure 5
(A) Representative steady-state affinity fitting for the SPR response of WPI BLG interacting with lysozyme in PBS yielding a KD value of (1.4 ± 0.2) mM which is indicated by the dashed line. (B) Steady-state affinity fitting for a representative SPR response for WPI BLG interacting with lysozyme in the presence of 10 mM arginine yielding a KD of (5 ± 1) M as indicated by the dashed line.

Similar articles

  • Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks.
    Preuss CV, Kalava A, King KC. Preuss CV, et al. 2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 30726003 Free Books & Documents.
  • Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training.
    Cedeno R, Bohlen J. Cedeno R, et al. 2024 Mar 29. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2024 Mar 29. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 36508513 Free Books & Documents.
  • Electrophoresis.
    Sonagra AD, Zubair M, Dholariya SJ. Sonagra AD, et al. 2025 Jul 14. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2025 Jul 14. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 36251838 Free Books & Documents.
  • The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.
    DeBattista C, Schatzberg AF. DeBattista C, et al. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024. PMID: 38993656 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Orthodontic treatment for crowded teeth in children.
    Turner S, Harrison JE, Sharif FN, Owens D, Millett DT. Turner S, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 31;12(12):CD003453. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003453.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34970995 Free PMC article.

Cited by

References

    1. Chandler D. Interfaces and the Driving Force of Hydrophobic Assembly. Nature 2005, 437 (7059), 640–647. 10.1038/nature04162. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang W.; Nema S.; Teagarden D. Protein Aggregation—Pathways and Influencing Factors. Int. J. Pharm. 2010, 390 (2), 89–99. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.02.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bruździak P.; Panuszko A.; Stangret J. Influence of Osmolytes on Protein and Water Structure: A Step To Understanding the Mechanism of Protein Stabilization. J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117 (39), 11502–11508. 10.1021/jp404780c. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arakawa T.; Timasheff S. N. Preferential Interactions of Proteins with Solvent Components in Aqueous Amino Acid Solutions. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1983, 224 (1), 169–177. 10.1016/0003-9861(83)90201-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Timasheff S. N. Protein-Solvent Preferential Interactions, Protein Hydration, and the Modulation of Biochemical Reactions by Solvent Components. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99 (15), 9721–9726. 10.1073/pnas.122225399. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources