New Intravesical Agents for BCG-Unresponsive High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
- PMID: 38993180
- PMCID: PMC11181857
- DOI: 10.3233/BLC-230043
New Intravesical Agents for BCG-Unresponsive High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
Abstract
Background: With the exception of the FDA-approved valrubicin and pembrolizumab, there are no standard second-line treaments for BCG-unresponsive high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).
Objectives: To provide a systematic review of the novel intravesically administered therapeutic agents for the salvage treatment of BCG-unresponsive NMIBC.
Methods: Online search of the PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases was performed. The endpoints of this review were to evaluate the efficacy of the agents in terms of complete response rates (CR) and durability of CR, overall survival, recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival and to report on their toxicity profile. A search on Clinicaltrials.gov was performed to identify ongoing clinical trials.
Results: 14 studies were included in this review. The critical clinical need for the development of an effective, safe and durable intravesical drug for the salvage treatment of high-risk NMIBC seems to be met mainly by intravesical gene therapy; in fact, data support the FDA-approved nadofaragene firadenovec as a potentially important therapeutic advancement in this context. Promising results are also being obtained by the combination of N-803/BCG and by innovative drug delivery systems.
Conclusions: Considering the plethora of novel intravesical treatments that have completed phase II evaluation, one can reasonably expect that clinicians will soon have at their disposal new agents and treatment options for BCG-unresponsive NMIBC. In the near future, it will be up to the urologist to identify, for each specific patient, the right agent to use, based on safety, results and cost-effectiveness.
Keywords: BCG; bladder cancer; bladder instillations; intravesical instillations; non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
© 2023 – The authors. Published by IOS Press.
Conflict of interest statement
A.D.A., M.K., G.C., O.F., F.H., M.R., A.G., P.G. have no conflicts of interest concerning the manuscript. G.G. is an Editorial Board Member of this journal, but was not involved in the peer-review process nor had access to any information regarding its peer-review.
Similar articles
-
Novel immunotherapeutic options for BCG-unresponsive high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Cancer Med. 2023 Dec;12(24):21944-21968. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6768. Epub 2023 Dec 1. Cancer Med. 2023. PMID: 38037752 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Systematic Review of the Therapeutic Efficacy of Bladder-preserving Treatments for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Following Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin.Eur Urol. 2020 Sep;78(3):387-399. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.02.012. Epub 2020 Mar 4. Eur Urol. 2020. PMID: 32143924 Free PMC article.
-
Revolutionizing Treatment: Breakthrough Approaches for BCG-Unresponsive Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 30;16(7):1366. doi: 10.3390/cancers16071366. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38611044 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Novel Delivery Systems and Pharmacotherapeutic Approaches for the Treatment of Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Dec;7(6):1267-1279. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.05.012. Epub 2024 Jun 6. Eur Urol Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38849286 Review.
-
The current landscape of salvage therapies for patients with bacillus Calmette-Guérin unresponsive nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer.Curr Opin Urol. 2021 May 1;31(3):178-187. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000863. Curr Opin Urol. 2021. PMID: 33742981 Review.
Cited by
-
Therapeutic Advances in Bladder Preservation for BCG-Unresponsive Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 14;17(4):636. doi: 10.3390/cancers17040636. Cancers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40002231 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- van Rhijn BWG, Burger M, Lotan Y, Solsona E, Stief CG, Sylvester RJ, Witjes JA, Zlotta AR. Recurrence and progression of disease in non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer: from epidemiology to treatment strategy. Eur Urol. 2009;56:430–42. - PubMed
-
- Pignot G, Baboudjian M, Lebacle C, Chamouni A, Lechevallier E, Irani J, Tillou X, Waeckel T, Monges A, Doisy L, Walz J, Gravis G, Mourey E, Duperron C, Masson-Lecomte A, Efficacy of hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC) in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer after BCG failure. World J Urol. 2023 Feb 22. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04332-z - DOI - PubMed
-
- Witjes JA. Management of BCG failures in superficial bladder cancer: a review. Eur Urol. 2006;49(5):790–7. - PubMed
-
- Catto JWF, Khetrapal P, Ricciardi F, Ambler G, Williams NR, Al-Hammouri T, Khan MS, Thurairaja R, Nair R, Feber A, Dixon S, Nathan S, Briggs T, Sridhar A, Ahmad I, Bhatt J, Charlesworth P, Blick C, Cumberbatch MG, Hussain SA, Kotwal S, Koupparis A, McGrath J, Noon AP, Rowe E, Vasdev N, Hanchanale V, Hagan D, Brew-Graves C, Kelly JD; iROC Study Team. Effect of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion vs open radical cystectomy on 90-day morbidity and mortality among patients with bladder cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2022;327:2092–103. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Yang LS, Shan BL, Shan LL, Chin P, Murray S, Ahmadi N, Saxena A. A systematic review and metaanalysis of quality of life outcomes after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Surg Oncol. 2016;25:281–97. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous