Are face transplant candidates choosing autonomously? A preliminary method to evaluate autonomous choosing in psychosocial and bioethical assessments
- PMID: 38993750
- PMCID: PMC11235316
- DOI: 10.3389/frtra.2024.1346667
Are face transplant candidates choosing autonomously? A preliminary method to evaluate autonomous choosing in psychosocial and bioethical assessments
Abstract
This report proposes a framework for evaluating the validity of informed consent and autonomy in face transplant candidates, taking into account the risk of depression and non-compliance. Traditional factors like decisional capacity, disclosure, comprehension, voluntariness, and agreement are insufficient for assessing valid informed consent in individuals whose self-worth relies on public perception, potentially leading to self-harm if societal worth is undermined. Reliance on self-esteem, rather than inherent personal value, poses risks of depression, poor treatment adherence, and deferential vulnerability. We suggest a qualitative analysis of self-worth, self-esteem, self-trust, and self-respect to better assess the autonomy of face transplant candidates in their decision-making process.
Keywords: autonomy; bioethical assessment; deferential vulnerability; informed consent; self-worth; vascularized composite allotransplantation.
© 2024 Farías-Yapur.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Corrigendum: Are face transplant candidates choosing autonomously? A preliminary method to evaluate autonomous choosing in psychosocial and bioethical assessments.Front Transplant. 2024 Jun 14;3:1433414. doi: 10.3389/frtra.2024.1433414. eCollection 2024. Front Transplant. 2024. PMID: 38993751 Free PMC article.
-
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26571285
-
Infringement of the right to surgical informed consent: negligent disclosure and its impact on patient trust in surgeons at public general hospitals - the voice of the patient.BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Oct 28;20(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0407-5. BMC Med Ethics. 2019. PMID: 31660956 Free PMC article.
-
Informed consent in theory and practice: legal and medical perspectives on the informed consent doctrine and a proposed reconceptualization.Crit Care Med. 1989 Dec;17(12):1346-54. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198912000-00022. Crit Care Med. 1989. PMID: 2686937 Review.
-
Informed consent in the elderly: assessing decisional capacity.Semin Perioper Nurs. 1997 Jan;6(1):59-64. Semin Perioper Nurs. 1997. PMID: 9087123 Review.
References
-
- Lantieri L, Cholley B, Lemogne C, Guillemain R, Ortonne N, Grimbert P, et al. First human facial retransplantation: 30-month follow-up. Lancet. (2020) 396(10264):1758–65. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources