Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 27:3:1346667.
doi: 10.3389/frtra.2024.1346667. eCollection 2024.

Are face transplant candidates choosing autonomously? A preliminary method to evaluate autonomous choosing in psychosocial and bioethical assessments

Affiliations

Are face transplant candidates choosing autonomously? A preliminary method to evaluate autonomous choosing in psychosocial and bioethical assessments

Anneke Farías-Yapur. Front Transplant. .

Abstract

This report proposes a framework for evaluating the validity of informed consent and autonomy in face transplant candidates, taking into account the risk of depression and non-compliance. Traditional factors like decisional capacity, disclosure, comprehension, voluntariness, and agreement are insufficient for assessing valid informed consent in individuals whose self-worth relies on public perception, potentially leading to self-harm if societal worth is undermined. Reliance on self-esteem, rather than inherent personal value, poses risks of depression, poor treatment adherence, and deferential vulnerability. We suggest a qualitative analysis of self-worth, self-esteem, self-trust, and self-respect to better assess the autonomy of face transplant candidates in their decision-making process.

Keywords: autonomy; bioethical assessment; deferential vulnerability; informed consent; self-worth; vascularized composite allotransplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Liu X, Langsdon S, Holloway W, Xu S, Tang Q, Xu Y, et al. The ethics of facial allotransplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. (2019) 7(10):e2425. 10.1097/gox.0000000000002425 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alexander AJ, Alam DS, Gullane PJ, Lengelé BG, Adamson PA. Arguing the ethics of facial transplantation. Arch Facial Plast Surg. (2010) 12(1):60–3. 10.1001/archfacial.2009.106 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Madani H, Hettiaratchy S, Clarke A, Butler PE. Immunosuppression in an emerging field of plastic reconstructive surgery: composite tissue allotransplantation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. (2008) 61(3):245–9. 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.08.011 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lantieri L, Cholley B, Lemogne C, Guillemain R, Ortonne N, Grimbert P, et al. First human facial retransplantation: 30-month follow-up. Lancet. (2020) 396(10264):1758–65. - PubMed
    1. Shanmugarajah K, Hettiaratchy S, Butler PEM. Facial transplantation. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. (2012) 20(4):291–7. 10.1097/moo.0b013e3283552cc5 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources