Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Nov 24:2:1286881.
doi: 10.3389/frtra.2023.1286881. eCollection 2023.

Mass spectrometry-based proteomics for advancing solid organ transplantation research

Affiliations
Review

Mass spectrometry-based proteomics for advancing solid organ transplantation research

Che-Fan Huang et al. Front Transplant. .

Abstract

Scarcity of high-quality organs, suboptimal organ quality assessment, unsatisfactory pre-implantation procedures, and poor long-term organ and patient survival are the main challenges currently faced by the solid organ transplant (SOT) field. New biomarkers for assessing graft quality pre-implantation, detecting, and predicting graft injury, rejection, dysfunction, and survival are critical to provide clinicians with invaluable prediction tools and guidance for personalized patients' treatment. Additionally, new therapeutic targets are also needed to reduce injury and rejection and improve transplant outcomes. Proteins, which underlie phenotypes, are ideal candidate biomarkers of health and disease statuses and therapeutic targets. A protein can exist in different molecular forms, called proteoforms. As the function of a protein depends on its exact composition, proteoforms can offer a more accurate basis for connection to complex phenotypes than protein from which they derive. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics has been largely used in SOT research for identification of candidate biomarkers and therapeutic intervention targets by so-called "bottom-up" proteomics (BUP). However, such BUP approaches analyze small peptides in lieu of intact proteins and provide incomplete information on the exact molecular composition of the proteins of interest. In contrast, "Top-down" proteomics (TDP), which analyze intact proteins retaining proteoform-level information, have been only recently adopted in transplantation studies and already led to the identification of promising proteoforms as biomarkers for organ rejection and dysfunction. We anticipate that the use of top-down strategies in combination with new technological advancements in single-cell and spatial proteomics could drive future breakthroughs in biomarker and therapeutic target discovery in SOT.

Keywords: biomarkers; bottom-up mass spectrometry; proteoforms; proteomics; solid organ transplantation; top-down mass spectrometry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare the following competing financial interest: NLK is involved in entrepreneurial activities in top-down proteomics and consults for Thermo Fisher Scientific. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Translational MS-based proteomics for identifying novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets in SOT research. (A) Overview of mechanisms contributing to SOT outcomes. (B) Workflow of translational bottom-up and top-down MS-based proteomics approaches in SOT.
Figure 2
Figure 2
BUP and TDP strategies for biomarker and therapeutic target identification. Workflows of BUP (A), TDP (B) and spatial proteomics (C) using mass spectrometry imaging approaches.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abecassis M, Bartlett ST, Collins AJ, Davis CL, Delmonico FL, Friedewald JJ, et al. Kidney transplantation as primary therapy for end-stage renal disease: a national kidney foundation/kidney disease outcomes quality initiative (NKF/KDOQITM) conference. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2008) 3(2):471–80. 10.2215/CJN.05021107 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tucker EL, Smith AR, Daskin MS, Schapiro H, Cottrell SM, Gendron ES, et al. Life and expectations post-kidney transplant: a qualitative analysis of patient responses. BMC Nephrol. (2019) 20(1):175. 10.1186/s12882-019-1368-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Giwa S, Lewis JK, Alvarez L, Langer R, Roth AE, Church GM, et al. The promise of organ and tissue preservation to transform medicine. Nat Biotechnol. (2017) 35(6):530–42. 10.1038/nbt.3889 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Floerchinger B, Oberhuber R, Tullius SG. Effects of brain death on organ quality and transplant outcome. Transplant Rev (Orlando). (2012) 26(2):54–9. 10.1016/j.trre.2011.10.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saidi RF, Elias N, Kawai T, Hertl M, Farrell ML, Goes N, et al. Outcome of kidney transplantation using expanded criteria donors and donation after cardiac death kidneys: realities and costs. Am J Transplant. (2007) 7(12):2769–74. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01993.x - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources