Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 16:2:1342471.
doi: 10.3389/frtra.2023.1342471. eCollection 2023.

A pragmatic approach to selective genetic testing in kidney transplant candidates

Affiliations

A pragmatic approach to selective genetic testing in kidney transplant candidates

Pitchaphon Nissaisorakarn et al. Front Transplant. .

Abstract

Introduction: Advances in the field of genetic testing have spurred its use in transplantation. Potential benefits of genetic testing in transplant nephrology include diagnosis, treatment, risk stratification of recurrent disease, and risk stratification in potential donors. However, it is unclear how to best apply genetic testing in this population to maximize its yield. We describe our transplant center's approach to selective genetic testing as part of kidney transplant candidate and donor evaluation.

Methods: Transplant recipient candidates were tested if they had a history of ESRD at age <50, primary FSGS, complement-mediated or unknown etiology of kidney disease, or had a family history of kidney disease. Donors were tested if age <35, were related to their potential recipients with known genetic susceptibility or had a first-degree relative with a history of kidney disease of unknown etiology. A targeted NGS gene panel of 385 genes was used. Clinical implications and downstream effects were monitored.

Results: Over 30% of recipients tested within the established criteria were positive for a pathogenic variant. The most common pathogenic variants were APOL1 high-risk genotypes as well as collagen 4-alpha-3, -4 and -5. Donor testing done according to our inclusion criteria resulted in about 12% yield. Positive test results in recipients helped with stratification of the risk of recurrent disease. Positive test results in potential donors guided informed decisions on when not to move forward with a donation.

Discussion: Integrating targeted panel genetic testing into a kidney transplant clinic in conjunction with a selective criteria for testing donors and recipients ensured a reasonable diagnostic yield. The results had implications on clinical management, risk stratification and in some cases were instrumental in directing downstream changes including when to stop the evaluation process. Given the impact on management and transplant decisions, we advocate for the widespread use of genetic testing in selected individuals undergoing transplant evaluation and donation who meet pre-defined criteria.

Keywords: donor testing; genetic testing; kidney transplantation; pathologic variants; recipient testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
MGH Kidney transplant clinic genetic testing protocol.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Diagnostic yield per indication for testing.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Diagnostic yield per age cut-off.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • The Role of Genetic Testing in Adult CKD.
    Knoers NVAM, van Eerde AM. Knoers NVAM, et al. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 Aug 1;35(8):1107-1118. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000401. Epub 2024 May 6. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024. PMID: 39288914 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Hill NR, Fatoba ST, Oke JL, Hirst JA, O'Callaghan CA, Lasserson DS, et al. Global prevalence of chronic kidney disease—a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. (2016) 11(7):e0158765. 10.1371/journal.pone.0158765 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bikbov B, Purcell CA, Levey AS, Smith M, Abdoli A, Abebe M, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet. (2020) 395(10225):709–33. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30045-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saran R, Li Y, Robinson B, Abbott KC, Agodoa LYC, Ayanian J, et al. US Renal data system 2015 annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. (2016) 67(3 Suppl 1):Svii–305. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.12.014 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McClellan WM, Satko SG, Gladstone E, Krisher JO, Narva AS, Freedman BI. Individuals with a family history of ESRD are a high-risk population for CKD: implications for targeted surveillance and intervention activities. Am J Kidney Dis. (2009) 53(3 Suppl 3):S100–6. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.07.059 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Connaughton DM, Bukhari S, Conlon P, Cassidy E, O'Toole M, Mohamad M, et al. The Irish kidney gene project–prevalence of family history in patients with kidney disease in Ireland. Nephron. (2015) 130(4):293–301. 10.1159/000436983 - DOI - PubMed