Mid-term clinical outcomes of the uncemented Robert Mathys pressfit cup
- PMID: 38994294
- PMCID: PMC11235464
- DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i19.3684
Mid-term clinical outcomes of the uncemented Robert Mathys pressfit cup
Abstract
Background: The use of uncemented cups during total hip arthroplasty (THA) has gained popularity in recent years. The Robert Mathys (RM) pressfit cup, an uncemented monoblock implant is expected to preserve bone density due to its composition and external surface, while reducing backside wear with its monoblock construction. These factors should lead to a high survival rate of the implant.
Aim: To evaluate the mid-term survival and functional outcome of the RM Pressfit cup in a large study population.
Methods: Between 2011 and 2020, we included 1324 patients receiving a primary THA using the RM pressfit cup. Final clinical follow-up was performed at 2 years postoperatively with the Dutch arthroplasty register used to assess implant status thereafter. Revision for acetabular failure and reason for revision were reported to evaluate implant survival, while the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) scores were used to assess functional outcome.
Results: The mean age at surgery was 64.9 years. The mean follow-up was 4.6 years. Of the 1324 THAs performed, 13 needed cup revisions within 5 years after index THA: 5 due to aseptic loosening, 6 due to infection, 2 due to dislocation and 2 due to other causes. This resulted in a 5-year cup survival of 98.8% (95%CI: 98.1-99.5). Nine of the cup revisions occurred within the first year after index THA. HOOS scores increased significantly in all domains during the first year and levelled out during the second year.
Conclusion: In the present study, the RM pressfit cup demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes at mid-term follow-up; however, future studies are needed to assess the long-term outcomes of this acetabular implant.
Keywords: Aseptic loosening; Cup revision; Hip osteoarthritis; Pressfit; Total hip arthroplasty; Uncemented RM pressfit cup.
©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors declare no conflict of interest related to the manuscript.
Figures


Similar articles
-
The 45-year evolution of the Mathys RM monoblock cups: have the paradigm shifts been worthwhile?Hip Int. 2023 Mar;33(2):193-202. doi: 10.1177/11207000211067507. Epub 2022 Apr 19. Hip Int. 2023. PMID: 35438033
-
RM Pressfit vitamys: the 10-year follow-up.Hip Int. 2025 Mar;35(2):142-149. doi: 10.1177/11207000241304659. Epub 2025 Jan 8. Hip Int. 2025. PMID: 39772936
-
The uncemented, titanium-coated rm cup: Survival and analyses of failures.Hip Int. 2005 Apr-Jun;15(2):71-77. doi: 10.1177/112070000501500202. Hip Int. 2005. PMID: 28224571
-
The RM Press fit cup™: an investigation in 182 hips at ten-year follow-up.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2024 Sep 6:103988. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103988. Online ahead of print. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2024. PMID: 39245266
-
Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3):B5350. Dan Med J. 2017. PMID: 28260601 Review.
References
-
- LROI Annual Report 2021. Accessed November 16, 2022. Available from: https://www.lroi-report.nl/hip/total-hip-arthroplasty/demographics/
-
- Morshed S, Bozic KJ, Ries MD, Malchau H, Colford JM Jr. Comparison of cemented and uncemented fixation in total hip replacement: a meta-analysis. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:315–326. - PubMed
-
- Mäkelä KT, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Virolainen P, Paavolainen P, Remes V. Cemented versus cementless total hip replacements in patients fifty-five years of age or older with rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:178–186. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources