Low Risk of Severe Complications After a Single, Post-Operative Instillation of Intravesical Chemotherapy in Patients with TaG1G2 Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma
- PMID: 38994541
- PMCID: PMC11181802
- DOI: 10.3233/BLC-201515
Low Risk of Severe Complications After a Single, Post-Operative Instillation of Intravesical Chemotherapy in Patients with TaG1G2 Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma
Abstract
Background: EAU guidelines recommend a single instillation (SI) of intravesical chemotherapy (e.g. Mitomycin C) within 24 hours after transurethral resection of a bladder tumour (TURBT) in patients with low- to intermediate risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer without (suspected) bladder perforation or bleeding requiring bladder irrigation. However, remarkable variation exists in the use of SI. The risk of severe complications is likely to contribute to this variation, but evidence is limited.
Objective: To investigate the absolute severe complication and mortality risk after SI in low- and intermediate risk bladder cancer.
Methods: In this observational, historic cohort study, data on 25,567 patients diagnosed with TaG1G2 urothelial bladder carcinoma (UBC) between 2009 and 2018 who underwent TURBT were collected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Data were supplemented with information on cause of death and severe complications after cancer treatment by re-examining the electronic health records and the 14-day complication risk and the 30-day mortality risk were evaluated.
Results: On average, 55% of patients had a SI after TURBT, varying from 0->80% between hospitals. The 30-day mortality risk was 0.02% and the 14-day risk of severe complications was 1.6%.
Conclusions: As the absolute risk of mortality and severe complications is very low, SI after TURBT can be considered a safe treatment in patients with low- to intermediate UBC without contraindications for SI. These results imply that a part of eligible patients is denied effective treatment.
Keywords: NMIBC; Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; complications; intravesical instillation; treatment guidelines; urothelial carcinoma; variation in healthcare.
© 2021 – IOS Press. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Lisa M.C. van Hoogtraten, J. Alfred Witjes, Theodora M. Ripping, Ronald I. Nooter, Lambertus A. Kiemeney, Katja K.H. Aben and the BlaZIB study group have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures



References
-
- Cambier S, Sylvester RJ, Collette L, Gontero P, Brausi MA, van Andel G, et al. EORTC Nomograms and Risk Groups for Predicting Recurrence, Progression, and Disease-specific and Overall Survival in Non-Muscle-invasive Stage Ta-T1 Urothelial Bladder Cancer Patients Treated with 1-3 Years of Maintenance Bacillus Calmette-Guerin. European Urology. 2016;69(1):60–9. - PubMed
-
- Sylvester RJ, Oosterlinck W, Holmang S, Sydes MR, Birtle A, Gudjonsson S, et al. Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials Comparing a Single Immediate Instillation of Chemotherapy After Transurethral Resection with Transurethral Resection Alone in Patients with Stage pTa-pT1 Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Which Patients Benefit from the Instillation? European Urology. 2016;69(2):231–44. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials