Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Oct;67(10):2075-2084.
doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06218-0. Epub 2024 Jul 12.

Use of diabetes technology in children

Affiliations
Review

Use of diabetes technology in children

Melissa J Schoelwer et al. Diabetologia. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Children with type 1 diabetes and their caregivers face numerous challenges navigating the unpredictability of this complex disease. Although the burden of managing diabetes remains significant, new technology has eased some of the load and allowed children with type 1 diabetes to achieve tighter glycaemic management without fear of excess hypoglycaemia. Continuous glucose monitor use alone improves outcomes and is considered standard of care for paediatric type 1 diabetes management. Similarly, automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have proven to be safe and effective for children as young as 2 years of age. AID use improves not only blood glucose levels but also quality of life for children with type 1 diabetes and their caregivers and should be strongly considered for all youth with type 1 diabetes if available and affordable. Here, we review key data on the use of diabetes technology in the paediatric population and discuss management issues unique to children and adolescents.

Keywords: Automated insulin delivery; Continuous glucose monitoring; Diabetes technology; Medical technology; Paediatric care; Review; Type 1 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Zhang K, Kan C, Han F et al (2023) Global, regional, and national epidemiology of diabetes in children from 1990 to 2019. JAMA Pediatr 177(8):837–846. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.2029 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lawrence JM, Divers J, Isom S et al (2021) Trends in prevalence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents in the US, 2001–2017. JAMA 326(8):717–727. 10.1001/jama.2021.11165 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rawshani A, Sattar N, Franzén S et al (2018) Excess mortality and cardiovascular disease in young adults with type 1 diabetes in relation to age at onset: a nationwide, register-based cohort study. Lancet (London, England) 392(10146):477–486. 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31506-x - PMC - PubMed
    1. Acerini CL, Williams RM, Dunger DB (2001) Metabolic impact of puberty on the course of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Metab 27(4 Pt 2):S19-25 - PubMed
    1. Michou P, Gkiourtzis N, Christoforidis A, Kotanidou EP, Galli-Tsinopoulou A (2023) The efficacy of automated insulin delivery systems in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes Mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 199:110678. 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110678 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources