Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep;48(9):2395-2401.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06251-z. Epub 2024 Jul 13.

Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament stabilizes the medial femoral condyle during kneeling using a tibial insert with ball-in-socket medial conformity

Affiliations

Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament stabilizes the medial femoral condyle during kneeling using a tibial insert with ball-in-socket medial conformity

Greg Harbison et al. Int Orthop. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: Resecting the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) increases posterior laxity and increases the flexion gap more than the extension gap in the native (i.e. healthy) knee. These two effects could lead to significant anterior displacement of the medial femoral condyle in kneeling following total knee arthroplasty even when using a tibial insert with a high degree of medial conformity. Using an insert with ball-in-socket medial conformity and a flat lateral articular surface, the primary purpose was to determine whether the medial femoral condyle remained stable with and without PCL retention during kneeling.

Methods: Two groups of patients were studied, one with PCL retention (22 patients) and the other with PCL resection (25 patients), while kneeling at 90º flexion. Following 3D model-to-2D image registration, A-P displacements of both femoral condyles were determined relative to the dwell point of the medial socket.

Results: With PCL resection versus PCL retention, the medial femoral condyle was 5.1 ± 3.7 mm versus 0.8 ± 2.1 mm anterior of the dwell point (p < 0.0001). Patient-reported function scores were comparable (p ≥ 0.1610) despite a significantly shorter follow-up of 7.8 ± 0.9 months with PCL retention than 19.6 ± 4.9 months with PCL resection (p < 0.0001). Range of motion was 126 ± 8° versus 122 ± 6° with and without PCL retention, respectively (p = 0.057).

Conclusion: Surgeons that use a highly conforming tibial insert design can stabilize the medial femoral condyle during kneeling by retaining the PCL. In patients with PCL resection, the 9 mm high anterior lip of the insert with ball-in-socket medial conformity was insufficient to prevent significant anterior displacement of the medial femoral condyle when weight-bearing on the anterior tibia.

Keywords: Image registration; Lowest point method; Single-plane fluoroscopy; Tibiofemoral kinematics; Total knee replacement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Song SJ, Park CH, Bae DK (2019) What to know for selecting cruciate-retaining or posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg 11:142–150. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2019.11.2.142 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Iwamoto K, Yamazaki T, Sugamoto K, Tomita T (2021) Comparison of in vivo kinematics of total knee arthroplasty between cruciate retaining and cruciate substituting insert. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol 26:47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmart.2021.10.002 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Victor J, Banks S, Bellemans J (2005) Kinematics of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining and-substituting total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg 87–B:646–655. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.87B5.15602 - DOI
    1. Pinskerova V, Vavrik P (2020) Knee Anatomy and Biomechanics and its Relevance to Knee Replacement. In: Riviere C, Vendittoli PA (eds) Personalized Hip and Knee Joint Replacement. Cham (CH). pp. 159–168
    1. Elorza SP, O’Donnell E, Nedopil AJ, Howell SM, Hull ML (2023) A new tibial insert design with ball-in-socket medial conformity and posterior cruciate ligament retention closely restores native knee tibial rotation after unrestricted kinematic alignment. J Exp Orthop 10:115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00671-3 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources