Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 2;14(13):1960.
doi: 10.3390/ani14131960.

Dynamic and Postural Changes in Forelimb Amputee Dogs: A Pilot Study

Affiliations

Dynamic and Postural Changes in Forelimb Amputee Dogs: A Pilot Study

Oliver Rodriguez et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

The amputation of a limb in quadrupeds can overload the remaining limbs, especially the contralateral one. The compensatory effort is especially high if it is a forelimb. It is, therefore, important to objectively know the changes in weight redistribution that occur in the animal while walking and standing still. With this objective, static (postural) and dynamic kinetic examinations were carried out on five French bulldogs with an amputated forelimb and five intact French bulldogs. For this examination, force and pressure platforms were used. The results were statistically compared using the student t-test. The parameters derived from the ground reaction forces were significantly higher in the amputee group. Surprisingly, postural examination showed that amputated dogs reached the same stability as healthy ones. Tripedal support in dogs does not objectively imply a loss of balance in quantitative terms; although the increase in force used by the remaining limb, as well as its altered cranial disposition during the support phase, may potentially predispose the animal to additional injuries in the future due to an overuse of different musculoskeletal units.

Keywords: dog; force; limb amputation; pressure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Force platform recording of an amputee dog. Horizontal forces and impulses are represented.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Postural exam of an amputee dog. Note that the leash around the neck is loose.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Statokinesiogram of a sound dog. Note the laterolateral orientation of the ellipse.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Statokinesiogram of an amputee dog. Note the craniocaudal orientation of the ellipse.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Paw pressure recorded during the support phase of a sound dog. The consecutive pink dots represent the COP pathway. The top of the image is cranial, bottom is caudal, right is medial and left is lateral. Note that the pathway starts at the center of the paw and runs cranially.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Paw pressure recorded during support phase of an amputee dog. The consecutive pink dots represent the COP pathway. The top of the image is cranial, bottom is caudal, right is medial and left is lateral Note that the pathway starts more caudally at the level of the metacarpal pad and runs cranially; this proves that when the limb makes contact with the ground, it is placed more cranially than sound forelimbs.

References

    1. Black L. Compensatory mechanisms in a dog after hind leg amputation. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1970;11:723–726. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1970.tb05576.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fuchs A., Anders A., Nolte I., Schilling N. Limb and back muscle activity adaptations to tripedal locomotion in dogs. J. Exp. Zool. Part A Ecol. Genet. Physiol. 2015;323:506–515. doi: 10.1002/jez.1936. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Galindo-Zamora V., von Babo V., Eberle N., Betz D., Nolte I., Wefstaedt P. Kinetic, kinematic, magnetic resonance and owner evaluation of dogs before and after the amputation of a hind limb. BMC Vet. Res. 2016;12:20. doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0644-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carberry C.A., Harvey H.J. Owner satisfaction with limb amputation in dogs and cats. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 1987;23:227–232.
    1. Withrow S.J., Hirsch V.M. Owner response to amputation of a pet’s leg. Vet. Med. Small Anim. Clin. 1979;74:332–334. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources