Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 26;13(13):3744.
doi: 10.3390/jcm13133744.

Robotic Mitral Valve Repair: Impact of Experience on Results and Complex Mitral Disease Treatment

Affiliations

Robotic Mitral Valve Repair: Impact of Experience on Results and Complex Mitral Disease Treatment

Antonio Lio et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Robotically assisted mitral valve (MV) surgery is the least invasive surgical approach to the MV. The aim of the present study is to report our experience with robotically assisted MV repair, trying to define how experience could impact on postoperative results. Methods: This is a retrospective study on 144 patients who underwent robotic MV repair from November 2011 to March 2023. Patients were divided in two groups: Group 1, including 39 patients (November 2011-January 2013) operated using the Da Vinci Si system, and Group 2, including 105 patients operated (February 2020-March 2023) using the new Da Vinci Xi system. Results: Mean age was 58 ± 10 years. Increased use of external aortic clamp was observed in Group 2. A significant reduction of surgical times was observed: cardiopulmonary bypass time was 155 ± 44 min in Group 1 and 121 ± 36 min in Group 2 (p = 0.002), whereas cross-clamp time was 112 ± 25 min in Group 1 and 68 ± 39 min in Group 2 (p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was 0.7%, and 10-year survival was 96 ± 2%. Freedom from reoperation was 100%. A higher percentage of complex and most complex MV repairs were performed in Group 2 (36% in Group 1 vs. 52% in Group 2, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Robotic-assisted MV repair is associated with excellent results. Experience is a key element to overcome the limitations of this technology. Finally, the robotic platform could improve results in difficult MV repair.

Keywords: minimally invasive; mitral valve; mitral valve repair; robotic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan–Meier curve of overall survival.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of MV complexity in all patients using Loulmet classification.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of MV complexity in Group 1 and Group 2 patients using Loulmet classification.

Similar articles

References

    1. Autschbach R., Onnasch J.F., Falk V., Walther T., Krüger M., Schilling L.O., Mohr F.W. The Leipzig experience with robotic valve surgery. J. Card. Surg. 2000;15:82–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2000.tb00447.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cao C., Wolfenden H., Liou K., Pathan F., Gupta S., Nienaber T.A., Chandrakumar D., Indraratna P., Yan T.D. A meta-analysis of robotic vs. conventional mitral valve surgery. Ann. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2015;4:305–314. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mihaljevic T., Jarrett C.M., Gillinov A.M., Williams S.J., DeVilliers P.A., Stewart W.J., Svensson L.G., Sabik J.F., Blackstone E.H. Robotic repair of posterior mitral valve prolapse versus conventional approaches: Potential realized. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2011;141:72–80.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.09.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murphy D.A., Moss E., Binongo J., Miller J.S., Macheers S.K., Sarin E.L., Herzog A.M., Thourani V.H., Guyton R.A., Halkos M.E. The expanding role of endoscopic robotics in mitral valve surgery: 1,257 consecutive procedures. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2015;100:1675–1681; discussion 1681–1682. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.05.068. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nifong L.W., Rodriguez E., Chitwood W.R., Jr. 540 consecutive robotic mitral valve repairs including concomitant atrial fibrillation cryoablation. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2012;94:38–43. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.11.036. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources