Influence of Schneiderian Membrane Perforation on Implant Survival Rate: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 38999315
- PMCID: PMC11242322
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133751
Influence of Schneiderian Membrane Perforation on Implant Survival Rate: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background: Maxillary sinus lift is a well-documented and accepted technique in the rehabilitation of the posterior maxilla. Schneiderian membrane perforation is the most common complication and may occur in between 7% and 56% of cases. Different materials and techniques have been described to achieve reparation of the perforation. The aim of this study was to establish whether the perforation of the Schneiderian membrane and its repair during maxillary sinus lift surgery results in a lower implant survival rate compared to those cases where the membrane has not been perforated. Materials and methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies assessing the survival rate of implants placed in regenerated sinus using the lateral window approach, where the perforation of the Schneiderian membrane occur, was carried out. Statistical analysis was performed with Open Meta-Analyst, calculating the odds ratio of implants placed in perforated sinuses and non-perforated sinuses. Results: Ten articles were included in the qualitative analysis and seven articles in the quantitative analysis or meta-analysis. A total of 1224 maxillary sinus augmentation surgeries were performed without perforation of the Schneiderian membrane and 2725 implants were placed; 62 implants failed during the follow-up period with an overall survival rate of 97.7%. In 480 perforated sinuses, 1044 implants were placed, of which 30 failed; the overall survival rate was 97.1%. There were no significant differences between the implant survival rate of the implants in the two groups (OR = 0.78; CI = 0.49-2.23; p = 0.28 and I2 heterogeneity: 0%, p = 0.44). Conclusions: Schneiderian membrane perforation, as long as it is repaired, does not appear to negatively influence implant survival rate. Membrane perforation should not be considered a reason to abort the procedure or an absolute contraindication to implant placement.
Keywords: bone regeneration; dental implants; maxillary sinus membrane; sinus floor augmentation.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Does intraoperative perforation of Schneiderian membrane during sinus lift surgery causes an increased the risk of implants failure?: A systematic review and meta regression analysis.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Oct;20(5):882-889. doi: 10.1111/cid.12660. Epub 2018 Aug 31. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018. PMID: 30168884
-
Clinical Outcomes of Maxillary Sinus Floor Perforation by Dental Implants and Sinus Membrane Perforation during Sinus Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 22;13(5):1253. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051253. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38592698 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of maxillary sinus membrane perforation on vital bone formation and implant survival: a retrospective study.J Periodontol. 2013 Aug;84(8):1094-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.120458. Epub 2012 Nov 23. J Periodontol. 2013. PMID: 23173826
-
Influence of exposing dental implants into the sinus cavity on survival and complications rate: a systematic review.Int J Implant Dent. 2019 Feb 5;5(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40729-019-0157-7. Int J Implant Dent. 2019. PMID: 30719578 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of schneiderian membrane perforation on posterior maxillary implant survival.J Int Oral Health. 2013 Jun;5(3):28-34. Epub 2013 Jun 23. J Int Oral Health. 2013. PMID: 24155599 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Alveolar ridge augmentation in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: a study on current practices, patient management and innovations in Germany.Int J Implant Dent. 2025 Apr 16;11(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40729-025-00619-5. Int J Implant Dent. 2025. PMID: 40237976 Free PMC article.
-
Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation With Autogenous Bone Versus Bovine Bone Mineral Mixed With 25% Autogenous Bone: A 1-Year Multicenter, Split-Mouth, Randomized Controlled Trial.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 Jul;36(7):859-870. doi: 10.1111/clr.14431. Epub 2025 Mar 17. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025. PMID: 40095360 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Case Report: A new modification of Loma Linda pouch technique.F1000Res. 2025 Aug 22;14:383. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.160451.3. eCollection 2025. F1000Res. 2025. PMID: 40386460 Free PMC article.
-
Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Transalveolar Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation with Rotatory Instruments: An 8-Year Follow-Up Prospective Clinical Study.J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 9;14(2):365. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020365. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 39860370 Free PMC article.
-
Dental Implant Rehabilitation of Posterior Maxillary Edentulism via Sinus Augmentation Using the Lateral Window Technique: A Retrospective Analysis of 289 Implants Followed Up for 15 Years.J Funct Biomater. 2025 Feb 13;16(2):65. doi: 10.3390/jfb16020065. J Funct Biomater. 2025. PMID: 39997599 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Arcas-Sanabre A.J., Gutierrez-Santamaria J., López-López J., Ayuso-Montero R., Velasco-Ortega E. Horizontal augmentation of the maxillary alveolar ridge to change the prosthetic profile: Clinical and radiological results of a retrospective study. J. Stomatol. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2020;121:25–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2019.08.001. - DOI - PubMed