Metabolic-Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) after Liver Transplantation: A Narrative Review of an Emerging Issue
- PMID: 38999436
- PMCID: PMC11242808
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133871
Metabolic-Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) after Liver Transplantation: A Narrative Review of an Emerging Issue
Abstract
The development of steatotic liver disease after liver transplant (LT) is widely described, and epidemiological data have revealed an increased incidence in recent times. Its evolution runs from simple steatosis to steatohepatitis and, in a small proportion of patients, to significant fibrosis and cirrhosis. Apparently, post-LT steatotic disease has no impact on the recipient's overall survival; however, a higher cardiovascular and malignancy burden has been reported. Many donors' and recipients' risk factors have been associated with this occurrence, although the recipient-related ones seem of greater impact. Particularly, pre- and post-LT metabolic alterations are strictly associated with steatotic graft disease, sharing common pathophysiologic mechanisms that converge on insulin resistance. Other relevant risk factors include genetic variants, sex, age, baseline liver diseases, and immunosuppressive drugs. Diagnostic evaluation relies on liver biopsy, although non-invasive methods are being increasingly used to detect and monitor both steatosis and fibrosis stages. Management requires a multifaceted approach focusing on lifestyle modifications, the optimization of immunosuppressive therapy, and the management of metabolic complications. This review aims to synthesize the current knowledge of post-LT steatotic liver disease, focusing on the recent definition of metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and its metabolic and multisystemic concerns.
Keywords: MASH; MASLD; liver transplant; metabolic-associated steatohepatitis; metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.
Conflict of interest statement
R.T. received consultant fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi-Aventis and lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, and Novo Nordisk. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Younossi Z.M., Stepanova M., Al Shabeeb R., Eberly K.E., Shah D., Nguyen V., Ong J., Henry L., Alqahtani S.A. The changing epidemiology of adult liver transplantation in the United States in 2013–2022: The dominance of metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease and alcohol-associated liver disease. Hepatol. Commun. 2023;8:e0352. doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000352. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Adam R., Karam V., Cailliez V., Grady J.G.O., Mirza D., Cherqui D., Klempnauer J., Salizzoni M., Pratschke J., Jamieson N., et al. 2018 Annual Report of the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR)-50-year evolution of liver transplantation. Transpl. Int. 2018;31:1293–1317. doi: 10.1111/tri.13358. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Stepanova M., Kabbara K., Mohess D., Verma M., Roche-Green A., AlQahtani S., Ong J., Burra P., Younossi Z.M. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the most common indication for liver transplantation among the elderly: Data from the United States Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Hepatol. Commun. 2022;6:1506–1515. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1915. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
