Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jul 3;13(13):3915.
doi: 10.3390/jcm13133915.

Traumatic Brain Injury as an Independent Predictor of Futility in the Early Resuscitation of Patients in Hemorrhagic Shock

Affiliations
Review

Traumatic Brain Injury as an Independent Predictor of Futility in the Early Resuscitation of Patients in Hemorrhagic Shock

Mahmoud D Al-Fadhl et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

This review explores the concept of futility timeouts and the use of traumatic brain injury (TBI) as an independent predictor of the futility of resuscitation efforts in severely bleeding trauma patients. The national blood supply shortage has been exacerbated by the lingering influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of blood donors available, as well as by the adoption of balanced hemostatic resuscitation protocols (such as the increasing use of 1:1:1 packed red blood cells, plasma, and platelets) with and without early whole blood resuscitation. This has underscored the urgent need for reliable predictors of futile resuscitation (FR). As a result, clinical, radiologic, and laboratory bedside markers have emerged which can accurately predict FR in patients with severe trauma-induced hemorrhage, such as the Suspension of Transfusion and Other Procedures (STOP) criteria. However, the STOP criteria do not include markers for TBI severity or transfusion cut points despite these patients requiring large quantities of blood components in the STOP criteria validation cohort. Yet, guidelines for neuroprognosticating patients with TBI can require up to 72 h, which makes them less useful in the minutes and hours following initial presentation. We examine the impact of TBI on bleeding trauma patients, with a focus on those with coagulopathies associated with TBI. This review categorizes TBI into isolated TBI (iTBI), hemorrhagic isolated TBI (hiTBI), and polytraumatic TBI (ptTBI). Through an analysis of bedside parameters (such as the proposed STOP criteria), coagulation assays, markers for TBI severity, and transfusion cut points as markers of futilty, we suggest amendments to current guidelines and the development of more precise algorithms that incorporate prognostic indicators of severe TBI as an independent parameter for the early prediction of FR so as to optimize blood product allocation.

Keywords: emergency; futility; hemorrhage; massive transfusion; resuscitation; shock; trauma; traumatic brain injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Types of severe traumatic brain injury arranged in ascending severity and blood product need from left to right. iTBI is TBI with no extracranial traumatic injury and no concomitant coagulopathy and, thus, does not require blood products for resuscitation. hiTBI is TBI with no extracranial traumatic injury but with concomitant CTBI and necessitates MT. ptTBI is TBI with extracranial traumatic injury and concomitant hemorrhagic shock and also requires MT. These polytraumatic injuries can be caused either by penetrating or blunt injury to the brain and to the extracranial structures simultaneously. Created using BioRender.com. hiTBI, hemorrhagic isolated traumatic brain injury; iTBI, isolated traumatic brain injury; ptTBI, polytraumatic traumatic brain injury; TBI, traumatic brain injury.
Figure 2
Figure 2
hiTBI and ptTBI patients undergoing massive transfusion for hemorrhagic shock. Potential markers during FTOs and TTOs for further research [1,3,4,7,58,119]. Adapted with permission from Ref. [7]. 2023, Van Gent (GCS and BFDP without paralysis or sedation).

References

    1. Clements T.W., Van Gent J.M., Lubkin D.E., Wandling M.W., Meyer D.E., Moore L.J., Cotton B.A. The Reports of my Death are Greatly Exaggerated: An Evaluation of Futility Cut-Points in Massive Transfusion. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023;95:685–690. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003980. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Doughty H., Green L., Callum J., Murphy M.F. Triage tool for the rationing of blood for massively bleeding patients during a severe national blood shortage: Guidance from the National Blood Transfusion Committee. Br. J. Haematol. 2020;191:340–346. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16736. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim J.S., Casem C.F., Baral E., Inaba K., Kuza C.M. Narrative Review: Is There a Transfusion Cutoff Value After Which Nonsurvivability Is Inevitable in Trauma Patients Receiving Ultramassive Transfusion? Anesth. Analg. 2023;137:354–364. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006504. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Loudon A.M., Rushing A.P., Hue J.J., Ziemak A., Sarode A.L., Moorman M.L. When is enough enough? Odds of survival by unit transfused. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023;94:205–211. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003835. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mladinov D., Frank S.M. Massive transfusion and severe blood shortages: Establishing and implementing predictors of futility. Br. J. Anaesth. 2022;128:e71–e74. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.10.013. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources