Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Jun 22;25(13):6852.
doi: 10.3390/ijms25136852.

Inflammatory Changes after Medical Suppression of Suspected Endometriosis for Implantation Failure: Preliminary Results

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Inflammatory Changes after Medical Suppression of Suspected Endometriosis for Implantation Failure: Preliminary Results

Bruce A Lessey et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Unexplained euploid embryo transfer failure (UEETF) is a frustrating and unanswered conundrum accounting for 30 to 50% of failures in in vitro fertilization using preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Endometriosis is thought by many to account for most of such losses and menstrual suppression or surgery prior to the next transfer has been reported to be beneficial. In this study, we performed endometrial biopsy in a subset of women with UEETF, testing for the oncogene BCL6 and the histone deacetylase SIRT1. We compared 205 PGT-A cycles outcomes and provide those results following treatment with GnRH agonist versus controls (no treatment). Based on these and previous promising results, we next performed a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing the orally active GnRH antagonist, elagolix, to oral contraceptive pill (OCP) suppression for 2 months before the next euploid embryo transfer, and monitored inflammation and miRNA expression in blood, before and after treatment. These studies support a role for endometriosis in UEETF and suggest that medical suppression of suspected disease with GnRH antagonist prior to the next transfer could improve success rates and address underlying inflammatory and epigenetic changes associated with UEETF.

Keywords: endometriosis; implantation; infertility; inflammation; recurrent pregnancy loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest, with the exception of Dan Angress who was PI for the NIH R44 funding and is Chief Operating Officer (COO) of CiceroDx, Inc. Bruce Lessey is associated with licensed technology from Prisma Health, related to BCL6 and SIRT1 biomarkers. Daniel Angress was employed in CiceroDx. The authors declare that this research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Normal endometrial receptivity is largely regulated by progesterone which down-regulates estrogen receptors and initiates an extensive list of activated genes, along with stromal decidualization which is critical for successful pregnancy (left). In endometriosis, due to immune activation and inflammatory cytokines, progesterone action is suppressed and estrogen signaling amplified, contributing to infertility and pregnancy loss. (b) Pregnancy success rates (live birth and ongoing pregnancy) in first attempt PGT-A (First PGTA), compared to those with prior failure and GnRH agonist suppression for 2 months (GnRHa) or no further treatment (NoTx). The pregnancy success rate (95% CI) was 71.65% (63.27% to 78.77%), 68.09% (53.83% to 79.6%), and 35.71% (16.34% to 61.24%), respectively. No treatment was inferior to either GnRHa suppression or first time PGT-A success rates (p = 0.02, chi-squared).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Differential expression of inflammation-related genes comparing pre- and post- treatment. (a) Heatmap of 10 differentially expressed transcripts (DETs; p ≤ 0.05) in peripheral blood detected using the Nanostring Inflammation panel before and after OCPs treatment. (b) Heatmap of 42 DETs (p ≤ 0.05) detected before and after elagolix treatment. Principal component analysis (PCA) plot for the OCP group (c) before and after treatment, and a PCA plot for the elagolix group (d).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Differential expression of miRNAs comparing pre- and post- treatment. (a) Heatmap of 10 differentially expressed miRNA transcripts (DETs; p ≤ 0.05) in peripheral blood detected using the Nanostring Human miRNA panel before and after OCPs treatment. (b) Heatmap of 337 DETs (p ≤ 0.05) detected before and after elagolix treatment. Principal component analysis (PCA) plot for the OCP group (c) before and after treatment, and a PCA plot for the elagolix group (d).

References

    1. Bulun S.E. Endometriosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;360:268–279. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0804690. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Giudice L.C. Clinical Practice. Endometriosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;362:2389–2398. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1000274. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Macer M.L., Taylor H.S. Endometriosis and Infertility: A Review of the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Endometriosis-Associated Infertility. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. 2012;39:535–549. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2012.10.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lessey B.A., Kim J.J. Endometrial Receptivity in the Eutopic Endometrium of Women with Endometriosis: It Is Affected, and Let Me Show You Why. Fertil. Steril. 2017;108:19–27. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.05.031. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agarwal S.K., Chapron C., Giudice L.C., Laufer M.R., Leyland N., Missmer S.A., Singh S.S., Taylor H.S. Clinical Diagnosis of Endometriosis: A Call to Action. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019;220:354.e1–354.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.12.039. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources