Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jun 28;16(13):2394.
doi: 10.3390/cancers16132394.

Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Affiliations
Review

Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Sven Zürcher et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: The first-line treatment of the localized form of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) remains surgical excision. Either conventional excision (CE) with margins or Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) may be preferred, depending on the risk factors of cSCC, the characteristics of the tumor, and the available technical facilities.

Methods: This article presents a systematic review of the current literature spanning from 1974 to 2023, comparing outcomes of cSCC treated with MMS versus cSCC treated with conventional excision.

Results: Out of the 6821 records identified through the database search, a total of 156 studies were screened, of which 10 were included in the review. The majority of the included studies showed that treatment of cSCC with MMS consistently exhibits a significantly lower risk of recurrence compared to treatment with CE. In addition, MMS is emerging as the preferred technique for the resection of cSCC located in aesthetically or functionally challenging anatomical areas.

Conclusion: The studies generally demonstrate that MMS is a safer and more effective treatment of cSCC than CE. Nevertheless, outcomes such as recurrence rates and cost-effectiveness should be assessed more precisely, in order to allow for a more tailored approach in determining the appropriate indication for the use of MMS.

Keywords: Mohs surgery; non-melanoma skin cancer; recurrence; squamous cell carcinoma; standard excision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of information during the different phases of systematic review.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nguyen K.D., Han J., Li T., Qureshi A.A. Invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma incidence in US health care workers. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2014;306:555–560. doi: 10.1007/s00403-014-1469-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kosmadaki M.G., Gilchrest B.A. The demographics of aging in the United States: Implications for dermatology. Arch. Dermatol. 2002;138:1427–1428. doi: 10.1001/archderm.138.11.1427-a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Karia P.S., Han J., Schmults C.D. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Estimated incidence of disease, nodal metastasis, and deaths from disease in the United States, 2012. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2013;68:957–966. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.11.037. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Que S.K.T., Zwald F.O., Schmults C.D. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Incidence, risk factors, diagnosis, and staging. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2018;78:237–247. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.08.059. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chockalingam R., Downing C., Tyring S.K. Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinomas in Organ Transplant Recipients. J. Clin. Med. 2015;4:1229–1239. doi: 10.3390/jcm4061229. - DOI - PMC - PubMed