Is There an Added Value of Quantitative DCE-MRI by Magnetic Resonance Dispersion Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis?
- PMID: 39001493
- PMCID: PMC11240399
- DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132431
Is There an Added Value of Quantitative DCE-MRI by Magnetic Resonance Dispersion Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis?
Abstract
In this multicenter, retrospective study, we evaluated the added value of magnetic resonance dispersion imaging (MRDI) to standard multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for PCa detection. The study included 76 patients, including 51 with clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), who underwent radical prostatectomy and had an mpMRI including dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Two radiologists performed three separate randomized scorings based on mpMRI, MRDI and mpMRI+MRDI. Radical prostatectomy histopathology was used as the reference standard. Imaging and histopathology were both scored according to the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System V2.0 sector map. Sensitivity and specificity for PCa detection were evaluated for mpMRI, MRDI and mpMRI+MRDI. Inter- and intra-observer variability for both radiologists was evaluated using Cohen's Kappa. On a per-patient level, sensitivity for csPCa for radiologist 1 (R1) for mpMRI, MRDI and mpMRI+MRDI was 0.94, 0.82 and 0.94, respectively. For the second radiologist (R2), these were 0.78, 0.94 and 0.96. R1 detected 4% additional csPCa cases using MRDI compared to mpMRI, and R2 detected 20% extra csPCa cases using MRDI. Inter-observer agreement was significant only for MRDI (Cohen's Kappa = 0.4250, p = 0.004). The results of this study show the potential of MRDI to improve inter-observer variability and the detection of csPCa.
Keywords: dynamic constrast-enhanced MRI; multiparametric MRI; pharmacokinetic analysis; prostate cancer.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures




References
-
- Drost F.-J.H., Osses D., Nieboer D., Bangma C.H., Steyerberg E.W., Roobol M.J., Schoots I.G. Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging, with or without Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy, and Systematic Biopsy for Detecting Prostate Cancer: A Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur. Urol. 2020;77:78–94. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.06.023. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Rouvière O., Puech P., Renard-Penna R., Claudon M., Roy C., Mège-Lechevallier F., Decaussin-Petrucci M., Dubreuil-Chambardel M., Magaud L., Remontet L., et al. Use of Prostate Systematic and Targeted Biopsy on the Basis of Multiparametric MRI in Biopsy-Naive Patients (MRI-FIRST): A Prospective, Multicentre, Paired Diagnostic Study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:100–109. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30569-2. - DOI - PubMed
-
- van der Leest M., Cornel E., Israël B., Hendriks R., Padhani A.R., Hoogenboom M., Zamecnik P., Bakker D., Setiasti A.Y., Veltman J., et al. Head-to-Head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-Guided Biopsy in Biopsy-Naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-Specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study. Eur. Urol. 2019;75:570–578. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.023. - DOI - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources