Worker perspectives on improving occupational health and safety using wearable sensors: a cross-sectional survey
- PMID: 39002148
- PMCID: PMC11427536
- DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxae057
Worker perspectives on improving occupational health and safety using wearable sensors: a cross-sectional survey
Abstract
Workplace exposure is an important source of ill health. The use of wearable sensors and sensing technologies may help improve and maintain worker health, safety, and wellbeing. Input from workers should inform the integration of these sensors into workplaces. We developed an online survey to understand the acceptability of wearable sensor technologies for occupational health and safety (OSH) management. The survey was disseminated to members of OSH-related organizations, mainly in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. There were 158 respondents, with over half (n = 91, 58%) reporting current use of wearable sensors, including physical hazards (n = 57, 36%), air quality (n = 53, 34%), and location tracking (n = 36, 23%), although this prevalence likely also captures traditional monitoring equipment. There were no clear distinctions in wearable sensor use between the reported demographic and occupational characteristics, with the exception that hygienists were more likely than non-hygienists (e.g. safety professionals) to use wearable sensors (66% versus 34%). Overall, there was an interest in how sensors can help OSH professionals understand patterns of exposure and improve exposure management practices. Some wariness was expressed primarily around environmental and physical constraints, the quality of the data, and privacy concerns. This survey identified a need to better identify occupational situations that would benefit from wearable sensors and to evaluate existing devices that could be used for occupational hygiene. Further, this work underscores the importance of clearly defining "sensor" according to the occupational setting and context.
Keywords: exposome; health and safety; occupational exposure; occupational hygiene; sensing technology; wearable sensors.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Barriers to the Adoption of Wearable Sensors in the Workplace: A Survey of Occupational Safety and Health Professionals.Hum Factors. 2018 May;60(3):351-362. doi: 10.1177/0018720817753907. Epub 2018 Jan 10. Hum Factors. 2018. PMID: 29320232 Free PMC article.
-
Advanced sensor technologies and the future of work.Am J Ind Med. 2022 Jan;65(1):3-11. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23300. Epub 2021 Oct 13. Am J Ind Med. 2022. PMID: 34647336
-
Direct-reading instruments for aerosols: A review for occupational health and safety professionals part 2: Applications.J Occup Environ Hyg. 2022 Dec;19(12):706-729. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2022.2132256. Epub 2022 Nov 2. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2022. PMID: 36197433 Review.
-
Review of ethics for occupational hygiene hazard monitoring surveys using sensors.J Occup Environ Hyg. 2023 Oct;20(10):439-451. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2023.2247018. Epub 2023 Aug 24. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2023. PMID: 37615412 Review.
-
Wearables for Industrial Work Safety: A Survey.Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jun 2;21(11):3844. doi: 10.3390/s21113844. Sensors (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34199446 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Fanti G, Spinazzè A, Borghi F, Rovelli S, Campagnolo D, Keller M, Borghi A, Cattaneo A, Cauda E, Cavallo DM.. Evolution and applications of recent sensing technology for occupational risk assessment: a rapid review of the literature. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 2022:22(13):4841. 10.3390/s22134841 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Flor-Unda O, Fuentes M, Dávila D, Rivera M, Llano G, Izurieta C, Acosta-Vargas P.. Innovative technologies for occupational health and safety: a scoping review. Safety 2023:9(2):35. 10.3390/safety9020035 - DOI
-
- Gómez-Carmona O, Casado-Mansilla D, García-Zubia J.. Opportunities and challenges of technology-based interventions to increase health-awareness in the workplace. Transforming Ergonomics with Personalized Health and Intelligent Workplaces 2019:25:33. 10.3233/978-1-61499-973-7-33 - DOI
-
- Greenwood PE, Nikulin MS. 1996. A guide to chi-squared testing (Vol. 280). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical