Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 13;24(1):148.
doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02271-w.

A compartmental model for smoking dynamics in Italy: a pipeline for inference, validation, and forecasting under hypothetical scenarios

Affiliations

A compartmental model for smoking dynamics in Italy: a pipeline for inference, validation, and forecasting under hypothetical scenarios

Alessio Lachi et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. .

Abstract

We propose a compartmental model for investigating smoking dynamics in an Italian region (Tuscany). Calibrating the model on local data from 1993 to 2019, we estimate the probabilities of starting and quitting smoking and the probability of smoking relapse. Then, we forecast the evolution of smoking prevalence until 2043 and assess the impact on mortality in terms of attributable deaths. We introduce elements of novelty with respect to previous studies in this field, including a formal definition of the equations governing the model dynamics and a flexible modelling of smoking probabilities based on cubic regression splines. We estimate model parameters by defining a two-step procedure and quantify the sampling variability via a parametric bootstrap. We propose the implementation of cross-validation on a rolling basis and variance-based Global Sensitivity Analysis to check the robustness of the results and support our findings. Our results suggest a decrease in smoking prevalence among males and stability among females, over the next two decades. We estimate that, in 2023, 18% of deaths among males and 8% among females are due to smoking. We test the use of the model in assessing the impact on smoking prevalence and mortality of different tobacco control policies, including the tobacco-free generation ban recently introduced in New Zealand.

Keywords: Calibration; Compartmental models; Cross validation; Forecasting; Global sensitivity analysis; Parametric bootstrap; Regression splines; Smoking attributable deaths; Smoking dynamics; Tobacco control policies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Smoking Habits Compartmental model in its simplest form
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Results of the two-step estimation procedure for males in blue and females in red, with their bootstrap 90% confidence intervals: parameters tuning the probabilities of starting (ψ) and stopping smoking (ϕ), and the probability of smoking relapse (ω) (a), age-specific mortality for never smokers and for the general population (b), probabilities of starting (γ(a)), and stopping smoking ( ϵ(a)) and probability of smoking relapse (η(c)) (c), observed and predicted prevalence for never (N), current (C) and former (F) smokers (d), Population Attributable Fraction (PAF) and Smoking Attributable Deaths (SAD) for people over the age of 35 (e) and 65 (f)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Results of the two-step estimation procedure for males in blue and females in red, by period of calibration (from 1993 to 2004 in a light colour and from 2005 to 2019 in a dark colour): probabilities of starting (γ(a)) and stopping smoking (ϵ(a)), and probability of smoking relapse (η(c)), with 90% confidence bands, (a) and (c); prevalence of never (N), current (C) and former (F) smokers, with 90% confidence bands, (b) and (d)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Estimated prevalence of never (N), current (C) and former (F) smokers under different tobacco control policies (TCP) with 90% confidence bands, for males (a) and females (b)

References

    1. IARC, editor. Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking: this publication represents the views and expert opinions of an IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, which met in Lyon, 11 - 18 June 2002. No. 83 in IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Lyon: IARC; 2004. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine (U S ), Bonnie RJ, Stratton KR, Wallace RB, editors. Ending the tobacco problem: a blueprint for the nation. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2007.
    1. IARC, editor. A review of human carcinogens. No. 100 in IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Lyon: IARC; 2012.
    1. Loring B. Tobacco and inequities: guidance for addressing inequities in tobacco-related harm. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe; 2014.
    1. GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1223–49. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources