Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jul 13;28(1):238.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05032-9.

Enhancing sepsis biomarker development: key considerations from public and private perspectives

Affiliations
Review

Enhancing sepsis biomarker development: key considerations from public and private perspectives

Jean-Francois Llitjos et al. Crit Care. .

Abstract

Implementation of biomarkers in sepsis and septic shock in emergency situations, remains highly challenging. This viewpoint arose from a public-private 3-day workshop aiming to facilitate the transition of sepsis biomarkers into clinical practice. The authors consist of international academic researchers and clinician-scientists and industry experts who gathered (i) to identify current obstacles impeding biomarker research in sepsis, (ii) to outline the important milestones of the critical path of biomarker development and (iii) to discuss novel avenues in biomarker discovery and implementation. To define more appropriately the potential place of biomarkers in sepsis, a better understanding of sepsis pathophysiology is mandatory, in particular the sepsis patient's trajectory from the early inflammatory onset to the late persisting immunosuppression phase. This time-varying host response urges to develop time-resolved test to characterize persistence of immunological dysfunctions. Furthermore, age-related difference has to be considered between adult and paediatric septic patients. In this context, numerous barriers to biomarker adoption in practice, such as lack of consensus about diagnostic performances, the absence of strict recommendations for sepsis biomarker development, cost and resources implications, methodological validation challenges or limited awareness and education have been identified. Biomarker-guided interventions for sepsis to identify patients that would benefit more from therapy, such as sTREM-1-guided Nangibotide treatment or Adrenomedullin-guided Enibarcimab treatment, appear promising but require further evaluation. Artificial intelligence also has great potential in the sepsis biomarker discovery field through capability to analyse high volume complex data and identify complex multiparametric patient endotypes or trajectories. To conclude, biomarker development in sepsis requires (i) a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach employing the most advanced analytical tools, (ii) the creation of a platform that collaboratively merges scientific and commercial needs and (iii) the support of an expedited regulatory approval process.

Keywords: Biomarker; Intensive care; Sepsis; Workshop.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

EDC declares being a previous member of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Sepsis Guideline Development Group, and a current member of Surviving Sepsis Campaign Pediatrics Guideline panel and Society of Critical Care Medicine Paediatric Sepsis Definition Task Force. She also declares NIHR-funded research collaboration with Biomerieux, and research funding from National Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR) and H2020. MB is currently working for Institut Merieux, a holding with bioMérieux as one of its companies. AGR has received consulting fees from Inotrem and Thermo Fisher for work related to sepsis biomarkers, and is the Chair of the International Sepsis Forum which is funded by industry. BF has received consulting fees from AM-Pharma, Inotrem, Aridis and Enlivex outside the submitted work. The other authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Biomarkers in the clinical management timeframe: key requirements & clinical goals. ED emergency department; ICU intensive care unit

References

    1. FDA-NIH Biomarker Working Group. BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) Resource. Silver Spring (MD): Food and Drug Administration (US); 2016. - PubMed
    1. Rubio I, Osuchowski MF, Shankar-Hari M, Skirecki T, Winkler MS, Lachmann G, et al. Current gaps in sepsis immunology: new opportunities for translational research. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19:e422–e436. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30567-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Iskander KN, Osuchowski MF, Stearns-Kurosawa DJ, Kurosawa S, Stepien D, Valentine C, et al. Sepsis: multiple abnormalities, heterogeneous responses, and evolving understanding. Physiol Rev. 2013;93:1247–1288. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00037.2012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hotchkiss RS, Monneret G, Payen D. Sepsis-induced immunosuppression: from cellular dysfunctions to immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13:862–874. doi: 10.1038/nri3552. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pairo-Castineira E, Rawlik K, Bretherick AD, Qi T, Wu Y, Nassiri I, et al. GWAS and meta-analysis identifies 49 genetic variants underlying critical COVID-19. Nature. 2023;617:764–768. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06034-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources