Evaluating artificial intelligence-enhanced digital urine cytology for bladder cancer diagnosis
- PMID: 39003588
- DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22884
Evaluating artificial intelligence-enhanced digital urine cytology for bladder cancer diagnosis
Abstract
Background: This study evaluated the diagnostic effectiveness of the AIxURO platform, an artificial intelligence-based tool, to support urine cytology for bladder cancer management, which typically requires experienced cytopathologists and substantial diagnosis time.
Methods: One cytopathologist and two cytotechnologists reviewed 116 urine cytology slides and corresponding whole-slide images (WSIs) from urology patients. They used three diagnostic modalities: microscopy, WSI review, and AIxURO, per The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS) criteria. Performance metrics, including TPS-guided and binary diagnosis, inter- and intraobserver agreement, and screening time, were compared across all methods and reviewers.
Results: AIxURO improved diagnostic accuracy by increasing sensitivity (from 25.0%-30.6% to 63.9%), positive predictive value (PPV; from 21.6%-24.3% to 31.1%), and negative predictive value (NPV; from 91.3%-91.6% to 95.3%) for atypical urothelial cell (AUC) cases. For suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (SHGUC) cases, it improved sensitivity (from 15.2%-27.3% to 33.3%), PPV (from 31.3%-47.4% to 61.1%), and NPV (from 91.6%-92.7% to 93.3%). Binary diagnoses exhibited an improvement in sensitivity (from 77.8%-82.2% to 90.0%) and NPV (from 91.7%-93.4% to 95.8%). Interobserver agreement across all methods showed moderate consistency (κ = 0.57-0.61), with the cytopathologist demonstrating higher intraobserver agreement than the two cytotechnologists across the methods (κ = 0.75-0.88). AIxURO significantly reduced screening time by 52.3%-83.2% from microscopy and 43.6%-86.7% from WSI review across all reviewers. Screening-positive (AUC+) cases required more time than negative cases across all methods and reviewers.
Conclusions: AIxURO demonstrates the potential to improve both sensitivity and efficiency in bladder cancer diagnostics via urine cytology. Its integration into the cytopathological screening workflow could markedly decrease screening times, which would improve overall diagnostic processes.
Keywords: The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology; artificial intelligence; bladder cancer; digital cytopathology; urine cytology; whole‐slide image.
© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Cytopathology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Cancer Stat Facts: Bladder Cancer. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, National Institutes of Health. Accessed December 15, 2020. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/urinb.html
-
- Guo CC, Czerniak B. Bladder cancer in the genomic era. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019;143(6):695‐704. doi:10.5858/arpa.2018‐0329‐ra
-
- Owens CL, Vandenbussche CJ, Burroughs FH, Rosenthal DL. A review of reporting systems and terminology for urine cytology. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013;121(1):9‐14. doi:10.1002/cncy.21253
-
- Riddle N, Parkash V, Guo CC, et al. Recent advances in genitourinary tumors updates from the 5th edition of the World Health Organization Blue Book Series. Arch Pathol Lab Med. Published online November 28, 2023. doi:10.5858/arpa.2022‐0509‐RA
-
- Renshaw AA, Nappi D, Weinberg DS. Cytology of grade 1 papillary transitional cell carcinoma: a comparison of cytologic, architectural and morphometric criteria in cystoscopically obtained urine. Acta Cytol. 1996;40(4):676‐682. doi:10.1159/000333938
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources