Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 8;194(4):1065-1071.
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae196.

Studying the association between longitudinal nondense breast tissue measurements and the risk of breast cancer: a joint modeling approach

Affiliations

Studying the association between longitudinal nondense breast tissue measurements and the risk of breast cancer: a joint modeling approach

Maya Illipse et al. Am J Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Conflicting results have appeared in the literature on whether the amount of nondense, adipose tissue in the breast is a risk factor or a protective factor for breast cancer (BC), and biological hypotheses supporting both have been proposed. We suggest here that limitations in study design and statistical methodology could potentially explain the inconsistent results. Specifically, we exploit recent advances in methodology and software developed for the joint analysis of multiple longitudinal outcomes and time-to-event data to jointly analyze dense and nondense tissue trajectories and the risk of BC in a large Swedish screening cohort. We also perform extensive sensitivity analyses by mimicking analyses/designs of previously published studies-for example, ignoring available longitudinal data. Overall, we do not find strong evidence supporting an association between nondense tissue and the risk of incident BC. We hypothesize that (1) previous studies have not been able to isolate the effect of nondense tissue from dense tissue or adipose tissue elsewhere in the body, that (2) estimates of the effect of nondense tissue on risk are strongly sensitive to modeling assumptions, or that (3) the effect size of nondense tissue on BC risk is likely to be small/not clinically relevant.

Keywords: breast cancer; breast density; joint longitudinal survival modeling; time-varying covariates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Smoothed raw trajectories for mammographic dense and nondense breast tissue areas constructed using data extracted from mediolateral oblique views, obtained using smoothing cubic regression splines on the entire study population. Data were obtained from the Karolinska Mammography Project for Risk Prediction of Breast Cancer (KARMA), Sweden, January 2011-March 2013.

Similar articles

References

    1. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. . Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(3):227-236. 10.1056/NEJMoa062790 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Palomares MR, Machia JRB, Lehman CD, et al. . Mammographic density correlation with Gail model breast cancer risk estimates and component risk factors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(7):1324-1330. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0689 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vachon CM, Van Gils CH, Sellers TA, et al. . Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction. Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9(6):217. 10.1186/bcr1829 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yaghjyan L, Colditz GA, Rosner B, et al. . Mammographic breast density and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women according to the time since the mammogram. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013;22(6):1110-1117. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0169 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vinnicombe SJ. Breast density: why all the fuss? Clin Radiol. 2018;73(4):334-357. 10.1016/j.crad.2017.11.018 - DOI - PubMed