Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 1;48(10):1284-1292.
doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000002286. Epub 2024 Jul 15.

Establishing Criteria for Tumor Necrosis as Prognostic Indicator in Colorectal Cancer

Affiliations

Establishing Criteria for Tumor Necrosis as Prognostic Indicator in Colorectal Cancer

Meeri Kastinen et al. Am J Surg Pathol. .

Abstract

Tumor necrosis has been reported to represent an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer, but its evaluation methods have not been described in sufficient detail to introduce tumor necrosis evaluation into clinical use. To study the potential of tumor necrosis as a prognostic indicator in colorectal cancer, criteria for 3 methods for its evaluation were defined: the average percentage method (tumor necrosis percentage of the whole tumor), the hotspot method (tumor necrosis percentage in a single hotspot), and the linear method (the diameter of the single largest necrotic focus). Cox regression models were used to calculate cancer-specific mortality hazard ratios (HRs) for tumor necrosis categories in 2 colorectal cancer cohorts with more than 1800 cases. For reproducibility assessment, 30 cases were evaluated by 9 investigators, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficients and Cohen's kappa coefficients were calculated. We found that all 3 methods predicted colorectal cancer-specific survival independent of other prognostic parameters, including disease stage, lymphovascular invasion, and tumor budding. The greatest multivariable HRs were observed for the average percentage method (cohort 1: HR for ≥ 40% vs. <3% 3.03, 95% CI, 1.93-4.78; cohort 2: HR for ≥ 40% vs. < 3% 2.97; 95% CI, 1.63-5.40). All 3 methods had high reproducibility, with the linear method showing the highest mean Spearman's correlation coefficient (0.91) and Cohen's kappa (0.70). In conclusion, detailed criteria for tumor necrosis evaluation were established. All 3 methods showed good reproducibility and predictive ability. The findings pave the way for the use of tumor necrosis as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: This study was funded by Cancer Foundation Finland (59-5619 to J.P.V.), Finnish Medical Foundation (6021 to J.P.V.; 6259 to M.K.), Oulu Medical Research Foundation (to M.K.), Sigrid Jusélius Foundation (230229 to J.P.V.), and Finnish State Research Funding (to M.J.M. and J.P.V.). T.T. Seppälä reports consultation fees from Amgen Finland, Tillots Pharma, and Nouscom, being a co-owner and CEO of Healthfund Finland Ltd, and a position in the Clinical Advisory Board and a minor shareholder of LS Cancer Diag Ltd. For the remaining authors, none were declared.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Three evaluation methods for tumor necrosis in colorectal cancer. (A) Overview of a tumor sample. (B) Evaluation of tumor necrosis using the average percentage method. (C) Evaluation of tumor necrosis using the hotspot method. (D) Evaluation of tumor necrosis using the linear method. Scale bars correspond to 2.5 mm.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Tumor necrosis evaluation methods and survival. Kaplan-Meier cancer-specific survival curves for the 3 tumor necrosis evaluation methods in cohort 1 (A-C) and cohort 2 (D-F).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Reproducibility analysis for the 3 tumor necrosis estimation methods. The reproducibility was measured with Spearman rank correlation analysis (A) and Cohen’s kappa (B–C).GIP, gastrointestinal pathologist; R, researcher; SP, specializing pathologist.

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. . Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–249. - PubMed
    1. Nagtegaal ID, Odze RD, Klimstra D, et al. . The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Histopathology. 2020;76:182–188. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Argilés G, Tabernero J, Labianca R, et al. . Localised colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:1291–1305. - PubMed
    1. Kastinen M, Sirniö P, Elomaa H, et al. . Immunological and prognostic significance of tumour necrosis in colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2023;128:2218–2226. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Richards CH, Roxburgh CSD, Anderson JH, et al. . Prognostic value of tumour necrosis and host inflammatory responses in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2012;99:287–294. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources