Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jun 14;5(6):101006.
doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2024.101006.

Recent methodological advances in federated learning for healthcare

Collaborators, Affiliations
Review

Recent methodological advances in federated learning for healthcare

Fan Zhang et al. Patterns (N Y). .

Abstract

For healthcare datasets, it is often impossible to combine data samples from multiple sites due to ethical, privacy, or logistical concerns. Federated learning allows for the utilization of powerful machine learning algorithms without requiring the pooling of data. Healthcare data have many simultaneous challenges, such as highly siloed data, class imbalance, missing data, distribution shifts, and non-standardized variables, that require new methodologies to address. Federated learning adds significant methodological complexity to conventional centralized machine learning, requiring distributed optimization, communication between nodes, aggregation of models, and redistribution of models. In this systematic review, we consider all papers on Scopus published between January 2015 and February 2023 that describe new federated learning methodologies for addressing challenges with healthcare data. We reviewed 89 papers meeting these criteria. Significant systemic issues were identified throughout the literature, compromising many methodologies reviewed. We give detailed recommendations to help improve methodology development for federated learning in healthcare.

Keywords: applications; best practices; deployment; federated learning; healthcare; machine learning; methodological advances; privacy; security; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Types of FL Schematic illustrating the feature and sample distributions for horizontal federated learning (HFL), vertical FL (VFL), and federated transfer learning (FTL).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Typical FL workflow The five key components are identified that form the basis of our analysis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
PRISMA flowchart Study selection for our systematic review highlighting the reasons for exclusion of manuscripts at different stages.

References

    1. Thomason J. Big tech, big data and the new world of digital health. J. Glob. Health. 2021;5:165–168.
    1. A plan for digital health and social care. 2022. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/a-plan-for-digital-health-and...
    1. Kapoor S., Narayanan A. Leakage and the reproducibility crisis in machine-learning-based science. Patterns. 2023;4 doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100804. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dittmer S., Roberts M., Gilbey J., Biguri A., Selby I., Breger A., Thorpe M., Weir-McCall J.R., Gkrania-Klotsas E., Korhonen A., et al. Navigating the development challenges in creating complex data systems. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2023;5:681–686. doi: 10.1038/s42256-023-00665-x. - DOI
    1. De Fauw J., Ledsam J.R., Romera-Paredes B., Nikolov S., Tomasev N., Blackwell S., Askham H., Glorot X., O'Donoghue B., Visentin D., et al. Clinically applicable deep learning for diagnosis and referral in retinal disease. Nat. Med. 2018;24:1342–1350. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0107-6. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources