Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 17:9:100792.
doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100792. eCollection 2024.

Exploring cheese and red wine pairing by an in vitro simulation of tasting

Affiliations

Exploring cheese and red wine pairing by an in vitro simulation of tasting

Alessandra Rinaldi et al. Curr Res Food Sci. .

Abstract

The cheese wine pairing is a beloved combination subject to a certain subjectivity due to sensorial, psychological, chemical, and cultural factors. This work represents a first attempt to explore the in vitro interactions between cheese, wine, and saliva to objectively measure the pairing. Two experimental red wines obtained from the same grape cultivar and four different cheeses were studied for their composition. Binding reactions between wine and cheese were carried out in three simulated tasting trials and, after precipitation, the wine phenolic content, Saliva Precipitation Index (SPI), and total proteins were evaluated. The optimal pairing (OP) was calculated considering the decrease in salivary and cheese proteins by wine, defined as the cleansing effect; the decrease in astringency due to the cheese, measured by the SPI, and the coating fat which would remain in mouth after eating a piece of cheese. Based on obtained results, the semi-hard cheese was identified as the best pairing option for the two experimental red wines. The differences in the phenolic content between the two wines were instead not enough to show a significant influence on the OP. The in vitro cheese wine pairing can contribute to understanding of wine tasting but it is only a part of the puzzle. However, this first contribution paves the way for additional studies on the molecular and chemical interactions involved in aroma and textural perception in simulated trials.

Keywords: Cheese; Pairing; Phenolic compounds; SDS-PAGE; Saliva; Wine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Image 1
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagrams production of Primo Sale (a), hard and semi-hard cheese (b) and dry ricotta cheese (c).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
SDS-PAGE of the total cheese proteins (M = semi hard cheese; P = Primo sale cheese; D = hard cheese; R = dry ricotta). MM: molecular marker (kDa).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Concentration of total phenolics (A), BSA-reactive tannins (B), total anthocyanins (C), and sum of polymeric pigments (D) in wines before (W1 and W2), and after the binding reaction 1 with saliva and cheese (M = semi-hard cheese; P = Primo sale cheese; D = hard cheese; R = dry ricotta). Error bars represent standard deviation over three replications.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The Saliva Precipitation Index (SPI) of wines before (W1 and W2) and after the binding reaction 3 (W1M, W1P, W1D, W1R; W2M, W2P, W2D, W2R) with cheeses (M = semi-hard cheese; P = Primo sale cheese; D = Hard cheese; R = dry ricotta) expressed in g/L of gallic acid equivalent (GAE). Error bars represent standard deviation over three replications.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The SDS-PAGE electrophoretic pattern of salivary proteins (S) interacting with cheeses (P, D, M, R), before (S + P, S + D, S + M, S + R) and after (S + P + W1, S + D + W1, S + M + W1, S + R + W1) the binding reaction 2 with wine W1 (Fig. 5A) and W2 (Fig. 5B). MM: molecular marker (kDa).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Cheese wine optimal pairing (OP) between wines (W1 and W2) and cheeses (M = semi-hard cheese; P = Primo sale cheese; D = hard cheese; R = dry ricotta). Error bars represent standard deviation over three replications.

Similar articles

References

    1. AOAC International . In: Official Methods of Analysis. 18th ed. Horwitz W., Latimer G., editors. AOAC; Gaithersburg, MD, USA: 2005. ISBN 0935584773.
    1. Bastian S.E.P., Payne C.M., Perrenoud B., Joscelyne V.L., Johnson T.E. Comparisons between Australian consumers' and industry experts' perceptions of ideal wine and cheese combinations. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2009;15(2):175–184. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2008.00043.x. - DOI
    1. Bastian S.E., Collins C., Johnson T.E. Understanding consumer preferences for Shiraz wine and Cheddar cheese pairings. Food Qual. Prefer. 2010;21(7):668–678. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.02.002. - DOI
    1. Borad S.G., Kumar A., Singh A.K. Effect of processing on nutritive values of milk protein. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017;57(17):3690–3702. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2016.1160361. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brandão E., Silva M.S., Garcia-Estevez I., Williams P., Mateus N., Doco T., de Freitas V., Soares S. Inhibition mechanisms of wine polysaccharides on salivary protein precipitation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020;68(10):2955–2963. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b06184. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources