Teaching team competencies within resuscitation training: A systematic review
- PMID: 39006135
- PMCID: PMC11239706
- DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100687
Teaching team competencies within resuscitation training: A systematic review
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of life support training with specific emphasis on team competencies on clinical and educational outcomes.
Methods: This systematic review was prospectively registered (PROSPERO CRD42023473154) and followed the PICOST (population, intervention, comparison, outcome, study design, timeframe) format. All randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies evaluating learners undertaking life support training with specific emphasis on team competencies in any setting (actual and simulated resuscitations) were included. Unpublished studies were excluded. Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases as well as trial registries were searched from inception to August 2023 (updated January 18, 2024). Two researchers performed title and abstract screening, full-text screening, data extraction, assessment of risk of bias (using RoB2 and ROBINS-I) and certainty of evidence (using GRADE). PRISMA reporting checklist was used to report the results. No funding was obtained to perform this systematic review.
Results: The literature search identified 5470 manuscripts. After the removal of 2073 duplicates, reviewing the remaining articles' titles and abstracts yielded 31 articles for full-text review. Of these, 17 studies were finally included. The studies involved the following training levels: basic life support, adult advanced life support, paediatric and neonatal resuscitations. Most studies (n = 16) evaluated outcomes in simulated, and only one study in actual resuscitations. Studies included in all training contexts showed either neutrality and/or benefits of life support training with specific emphasis on team competencies. Team competencies training improved CPR skill performance and CPR quality. Specific team competencies that improved included leadership, communication, decision-making and task management. No undesirable effects were observed. Meta-analysis was not possible due to significant methodological heterogeneity. Sub-group analysis was impossible due to lack of data. Risk of bias assessment ranged from some concerns to serious. Overall certainty of evidence was rated as low to very low due to risk of bias and imprecision.
Conclusion: This systematic review identified very low and low certainty evidence, almost entirely derived from simulation studies. The studies and their findings were heterogenous but suggest that teaching team competencies can improve resuscitation skills performance and CPR quality, as well as improve team competencies, specifically leadership, communication, decision-making, and task management. Further research is required to understand optimal configuration of team competencies training interventions and to understand the effect on clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
Keywords: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Communication; Decision-making; Team competencies; Teamwork; Workload.
© 2024 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: BF, AC, KGL, JY, SN and RG are members of the ILCOR EIT Task Force (RG is chair). RG is ERC Director of Guidelines and ILCOR; RG, KGL and JY are Editorial Board members of Resuscitation Plus.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Cognitive aids used in simulated resuscitation: A systematic review.Resusc Plus. 2024 Jun 1;19:100675. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100675. eCollection 2024 Sep. Resusc Plus. 2024. PMID: 38873274 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Stepwise approach to skills teaching in resuscitation: A systematic review.Resusc Plus. 2023 Aug 28;16:100457. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100457. eCollection 2023 Dec. Resusc Plus. 2023. PMID: 37674547 Free PMC article. Review.
-
In situ simulation for cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: A systematic review.Resusc Plus. 2025 Jan 3;21:100863. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100863. eCollection 2025 Jan. Resusc Plus. 2025. PMID: 39897060 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
School-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: a systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 9;14(1):i-216. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.1. eCollection 2018. Campbell Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 37131379 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The impact of additional special emergency medical service units on non-traumatic adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in a high-resource metropolitan area.Resusc Plus. 2025 Jul 25;25:101046. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101046. eCollection 2025 Sep. Resusc Plus. 2025. PMID: 40800010 Free PMC article.
-
Strengthening trauma resuscitation education and training in low-resource settings: A call for global inclusion.Resusc Plus. 2025 Mar 20;23:100935. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100935. eCollection 2025 May. Resusc Plus. 2025. PMID: 40235927 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Resuscitation education for NICU providers: Current practice and recommendations for NRP and PALS in the NICU.Semin Perinatol. 2024 Dec;48(8):151991. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2024.151991. Epub 2024 Oct 9. Semin Perinatol. 2024. PMID: 39406611 Review.
-
Acceptance and implementation of evidence-based practices in delivery room resuscitation: A qualitative study.SSM Qual Res Health. 2025 Jun;7:100557. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100557. Epub 2025 Apr 1. SSM Qual Res Health. 2025. PMID: 40718678 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gordon M., Baker P., Catchpole K., Darbyshire D., Schocken D. Devising a consensus definition and framework for non-technical skills in healthcare to support educational design: A modified Delphi study. Med Teach. 2015;37:572–577. - PubMed
-
- Cheng A., Magid D.J., Auerbach M., et al. Donoghue A: Part 6: Resuscitation education science: 2020 American heart association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation (New York, N.Y.) 2020;142:S551–S579. - PubMed
-
- Greif R., Lockey A., Breckwoldt J., et al. European resuscitation council guidelines 2021: Education for resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2021;161:388–407. - PubMed
-
- Greif R., Bhanji F., Bigham B.L., et al. Education, implementation, and teams: 2020 International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Resuscitation. 2020;156:A188–A239. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources