Associations of Immune Checkpoint Predictive Biomarkers (MHC-I and MHC-II) with Clinical and Molecular Features in a Diverse Breast Cancer Cohort
- PMID: 39007881
- PMCID: PMC11398978
- DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1286
Associations of Immune Checkpoint Predictive Biomarkers (MHC-I and MHC-II) with Clinical and Molecular Features in a Diverse Breast Cancer Cohort
Abstract
Purpose: Immunotherapy (IO) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has improved survival outcomes, with promising improvements in pCR rates among early high-risk hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2- breast cancers. However, biomarkers are needed to select patients likely to benefit from IO. MHC-I and tumor-specific MHC-II (tsMHC-II) expression are candidate biomarkers for PD-(L)1 checkpoint inhibition but existing data from clinical trials included limited racial/ethnic diversity.
Experimental design: We performed multiplexed immunofluorescence assays in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS; n = 1,628, 48% Black, 52% non-Black). Intrinsic subtype and P53 mutant-like status were identified using RNA-based multigene assays. We ranked participants based on tumoral MHC-I intensity (top 33% categorized as "MHC-Ihigh") and MHC-II+ (≥5% of tumor cells as tsMHC-II+). MHC-I/II were evaluated in association with clinicopathological features by race.
Results: Black participants had higher frequency of TNBC (25% vs. 12.5%, P ≤ 0.001) and basal-like (30% vs. 14%, P ≤ 0.001) tumors overall, and higher frequency of basal-like (11% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.002) and TP53 mutant tumors (26% vs. 17%, P = 0.002) among HR+/HER2-. The frequency of tsMHC-II+ was higher in HR+/HER2- Black participants (7.9% vs. 4.9%, P = 0.04). Black participants also had higher frequency of MHC-Ihigh (38.7% vs. 28.2%, P < 0.001), which was significant among HR+/HER2- (28.2% vs. 22.1%, P = 0.02).
Conclusions: In this diverse study population, MHC-I and MHC-II tumor cell expression were more highly expressed in HR+/HER2- tumors from Black women, underscoring the importance of diverse and equitable enrollment in future IO trials.
©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interests
Justin Balko receives research support from Genentech/Roche and Incyte Corporation, has received advisory board payments from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, and Mallinckrodt and is an inventor on patents regarding immunotherapy targets and biomarkers in cancer. Charles M. Perou is an equity stockholder and consultant of BioClassifier LLC; Charles M. Perou is also listed as an inventor on patent applications for the Breast PAM50 Subtyping assay. Laura C. Kennedy has research support from Puma Biotechnologies and Hoffmann-Roche and consulting fees from Daiichi-Sankyo. The other authors disclosed no conflicts of interest.
Figures

References
-
- Cardoso F, McArthur HL, Schmid P, et al. LBA21 KEYNOTE-756: Phase III study of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab (pembro) or placebo (pbo) + chemotherapy (chemo), followed by adjuvant pembro or pbo + endocrine therapy (ET) for early-stage high-risk ER+/HER2– breast cancer. Annals of Oncology. 2023;34:S1260–S1261. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2023.10.011 - DOI
-
- Loi S, Curigliano G, Salgado RF, et al. LBA20 A randomized, double-blind trial of nivolumab (NIVO) vs placebo (PBO) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) ± NIVO in patients (pts) with high-risk, ER+ HER2− primary breast cancer (BC). Annals of Oncology. 2023;34:S1259–S1260. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2023.10.010 - DOI
-
- Nanda R, Liu MC, Yau C, et al. Effect of Pembrolizumab Plus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Pathologic Complete Response in Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: An Analysis of the Ongoing Phase 2 Adaptively Randomized I-SPY2 Trial. JAMA Oncol. May 1 2020;6(5):676–684. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.6650 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials