Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;21(1):2377178.
doi: 10.1080/15502783.2024.2377178. Epub 2024 Jul 15.

An examination of the associations between nutritional peaking strategies in physique sport and competitor characteristics

Affiliations

An examination of the associations between nutritional peaking strategies in physique sport and competitor characteristics

Kai A Homer et al. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Physique athletes are subjectively judged on their on-stage esthetic per their competition division criteria. To succeed, competitors look to acutely enhance their appearance by manipulating nutritional variables in the days leading up to competition, commonly referred to as peak week (PW). Despite their documented wide adoption, PW strategies lack experimental evidence. Further, the relationship between the specific strategies and the characteristics of the competitors who implement them are unknown. The aim of this research was to examine the effect of competitor characteristics on the specific nutritional peaking strategies implemented, the length of these strategies, and the range of daily carbohydrate (CHO) intakes during these strategies.

Methods: A 58-item survey was developed to gather information on peak week nutrition and training practices of physique athletes. A total of 160 respondents above the age of 18 who had competed in the last 5 years completed the nutrition section. The topics analyzed for this paper included competitor demographics, peaking strategies utilized, and PW CHO intakes. Competitor demographics are presented with the use of descriptive statistics. Associations between competitor demographics and peaking strategies implemented, peaking strategy length, and daily CHO intake ranges were assessed using multiple logistic regression, multiple ordinal logistic regression, and linear mixed models, respectively.

Results: From the sampled population, ages 24-39 years (71.2%), male (68.8%), natural (65%), and amateur (90%) were the most common characteristics from their respective categories, while mean competition preparation length was 20.35 ± 8.03 weeks (Males: 19.77 ± 7.56 weeks, Females: 21.62 ± 8.93 weeks), competition preparation body mass loss was 11.5 ± 5.56 kg (M: 12.7 ± 5.76 kg, F: 7.16 ± 3.99 kg), and competition body mass was 72.09 ± 15.74 kg (M: 80.15 ± 11.33 kg, F: 54.34 ± 7.16 kg). For males, the highest and lowest daily CHO intake during PW were 489.63 ± 224.03 g (6.22 ± 2.93 g/kg body mass) and 148.64 ± 152.01 g (1.94 ± 2.17 g/kg), respectively, while for females these values were 266.73 ± 131.23 g (5.06 ± 2.67 g/kg) and 94.42 ± 80.72 g (1.81 ± 1.57 g/kg), respectively. CHO back loading (45%) and water loading (40.6%) were the most popular peaking strategies, while the most prevalent peaking strategy length was 7 days (27.2%). None of the competitor characteristics predicted the use of CHO-based peaking strategies nor peaking strategy length. For non-CHO-based strategies, drug-enhanced competitors were more likely to restrict water than non-drug enhanced, while males and professional competitors had greater odds of loading sodium than females and amateurs, respectively. Finally, when comparing the disparity in highest and lowest CHO intakes during peak week, sex was the only significant factor.

Conclusions: The results of this survey provide further information on the nutritional peaking strategies implemented by competitors. Certain characteristics were identified as predictors of sodium loading and water restriction, and the range of daily PW CHO intake. Contrastingly, no associations were found for CHO-based peaking strategies or peaking strategy length. While our analyses may be underpowered, and thus results should be interpreted with caution, it appears the nutritional peaking strategies implemented by physique competitors are seemingly complex and highly individual.

Keywords: Peak week; carbohydrate; nutrition; sodium; water.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Kai Homer, Matt Cross, and Eric Helms declare that they have no conflict of interest relevant to the content of this research. Eric Helms is a writer and coach in the bodybuilding and fitness industry.

Similar articles

References

    1. Homer KA, Cross MR, Helms ER.. Peak week carbohydrate manipulation practices in physique athletes: a narrative review. Sports Med-Open. 2024;10(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00674-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Escalante G, Stevenson SW, Barakat C, et al. Peak week recommendations for bodybuilders: an evidence based approach. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2021;13(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13102-021-00296-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Helms ER, Aragon AA, Fitschen PJ. Evidence-based recommendations for natural bodybuilding contest preparation: nutrition and supplementation. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2014;11(1):20. doi: 10.1186/1550-2783-11-20 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pivovarov AS, Calahorro F, Walker RJ. Na+/K±pump and neurotransmitter membrane receptors. Invert Neurosci. 2018;19(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s10158-018-0221-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hickson JF, Johnson TE, Lee W, et al. Nutrition and the precontest preparations of a male bodybuilder. J Am Diet Assoc. 1990;90(2):264–17. - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources