Farmed fish welfare research status in Latin America: A review
- PMID: 39009502
- DOI: 10.1111/jfb.15854
Farmed fish welfare research status in Latin America: A review
Abstract
Latin America (LATAM) plays an important role in the world's production of aquatic animals and is the second most productive region in the world. Chile, Ecuador, Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, and Perú contribute 87% of LATAM aquaculture production. The fish welfare in aquaculture is of increasing public concern globally, and LATAM is no exception, growing in importance for fish farmers, authorities, and scientists. Although the topic is somewhat controversial, the welfare status of farmed fish has direct implications for their production and the sustainability of the industry. Therefore, this study analyses scientific papers on animal welfare in farmed fish, from the six countries in LATAM with the highest aquaculture production. The main objectives were to quantify the number of papers published between 2000 and 2023 on fish welfare by using scientific databases. A total of 285 papers were found for the period analysed. The country with the largest number of publications was Brazil (75.79%), followed by Chile (13.33%), Mexico (7.02%), Peru (1.75%), Ecuador, and Colombia (1.05%). Nile tilapia was the most studied species, appearing in 30.18% of the publications, with most of the studies mainly dealing with nutrition (32.28%). The growth of aquaculture is leading to joint efforts to generate knowledge on welfare issues, especially in poorly studied species with high production, to create policies that help minimize welfare risks. Given this, the insights generated by this review could be a useful addition to approaches investigating the trends and concepts of fish welfare in LATAM.
Keywords: Latin American aquaculture; fish farming; scientific research; sustainability; welfare protection.
© 2024 Fisheries Society of the British Isles.
Similar articles
-
The 2023 Latin America report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024. PMID: 38800647 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Surveying the welfare of farmed fish species on a global scale through the fair-fish database.J Fish Biol. 2024 Sep;105(3):960-974. doi: 10.1111/jfb.15846. Epub 2024 Jun 25. J Fish Biol. 2024. PMID: 38924085
-
Taking account of fish welfare: lessons from aquaculture.J Fish Biol. 2009 Dec;75(10):2862-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02465.x. J Fish Biol. 2009. PMID: 20738532
-
Animal welfare in Latin America: Trends and characteristics of scientific publications.Front Vet Sci. 2022 Nov 18;9:1030454. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1030454. eCollection 2022. Front Vet Sci. 2022. PMID: 36467645 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Animal welfare risks of global aquaculture.Sci Adv. 2021 Apr 2;7(14):eabg0677. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abg0677. Print 2021 Apr. Sci Adv. 2021. PMID: 33811081 Free PMC article. Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Afewerki, S., Asche, F., Misund, B., Thorvaldsen, T., & Tveteras, R. (2022). Innovation in the Norwegian aquaculture industry. Reviews in Aquaculture, 15(2), 759–771.
-
- Ashley, P. J. (2007). Fish welfare: Current issues in aquaculture. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 104, 199–235.
-
- Aydın, B., Akhan, S., Gümüş, E., & Özbaş, M. (2019). Anesthetic efficacy of clove oil and 2‐phenoxyethanol on doctor fish, Garra rufa (Heckel, 1843). Boletim Do Instituto de Pesca, 45(4), e506.
-
- Barreto, M. O., Rey Planellas, S., Yang, Y., Phillips, C., & Descovich, K. (2021). Emerging indicators of fish welfare in aquaculture. Reviews in Aquaculture, 14, 343–361.
-
- Bergh, Ø. (2007). The dual myths of the healthy wild fish and the unhealthy farmed fish. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 75, 159–164.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources