Trends in reported outcomes and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in humeral shaft fracture literature: a systematic review
- PMID: 39009710
- DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-04039-w
Trends in reported outcomes and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in humeral shaft fracture literature: a systematic review
Abstract
Purpose: With a lack of standardization among outcome measures in fracture literature, cross-study comparisons remain limited. This systematic review aimed to identify trends in outcome measures reported by studies of the treatment of humeral shaft fractures.
Methods: A systematic review was performed of studies reporting clinical outcomes of humeral shaft fractures indexed in PubMed. Extracted data included demographics, fracture characteristics, treatment modalities, outcomes, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), and journal characteristics. Cochran-Armitage tests and linear regressions were used to identify data trends. Pearson chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for comparisons between studies.
Results: This review included 197 studies with outcomes of 15,445 humeral shaft fractures. 126 studies reported PROMs and 37 different PROMs were used. The Constant Score was most commonly reported (34% of studies), followed by ASES Score (21%), MEPS (21%), and DASH Score (20%). There was a significant increase in PROM usage over time (p = 0.016) and in articles using three or more PROMs (p = 0.005). The number of PROMs were significantly greater in prospective cohort studies and RCTs (p = 0.012) compared to retrospective cohort studies and case series (p = 0.044 for both). Post-treatment shoulder motion was reported in 43% of studies and 34% reported elbow motion. 86% of studies reported complications as an outcome parameter. Time to union and nonunion rate were published in 69% and 88% of studies, respectively.
Conclusion: This study identified increasing PROM usage over time and disparities in the reporting of outcomes in humeral shaft fracture literature requiring further validation and standardization of available outcome measures.
Keywords: Fracture management; Humeral shaft fracture; Outcome trends; PROM; Patient-reported outcome measures.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Bergdahl C, Ekholm C, Wennergren D, Nilsson F, Möller M (2016) Epidemiology and patho-anatomical pattern of 2,011 humeral fractures: data from the Swedish fracture register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 17:159. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1009-8 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Ekholm R, Adami J, Tidermark J, Hansson K, Törnkvist H, Ponzer S (2006) Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. An epidemiological study of 401 fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:1469–73. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.88B11.17634 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sargeant HW, Farrow L, Barker S, Kumar K (2020) Operative versus non-operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures: a systematic review. Shoulder Elb 12:229–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573218825477 - DOI
-
- Van Bergen SH, Mahabier KC, Van Lieshout EMM, Van der Torre T, Notenboom CAW, Jawahier PA et al (2023) Humeral shaft fracture: systematic review of non-operative and operative treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143:5035–5054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04836-8 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Churruca K, Pomare C, Ellis LA, Long JC, Henderson SB, Murphy LED et al (2021) Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): a review of generic and condition-specific measures and a discussion of trends and issues. Health Expect Int J Public Particip Health Care Health Policy 24:1015–1024. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13254 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
