Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Oct;47(10):991-1010.
doi: 10.1007/s40264-024-01458-w. Epub 2024 Jul 15.

Safety and Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines During Pregnancy: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Safety and Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines During Pregnancy: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Agustín Ciapponi et al. Drug Saf. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Pregnant persons are susceptible to significant complications following COVID-19, even death. However, worldwide COVID-19 vaccination coverage during pregnancy remains suboptimal.

Objective: This study assessed the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines administered to pregnant persons and shared this evidence via an interactive online website.

Methods: We followed Cochrane methods to conduct this living systematic review. We included studies assessing the effects of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant persons. We conducted searches every other week for studies until October 2023, without restrictions on language or publication status, in ten databases, guidelines, preprint servers, and COVID-19 websites. The reference lists of eligible studies were hand searched to identify additional relevant studies. Pairs of review authors independently selected eligible studies using the web-based software COVIDENCE. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by pairs of authors. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. We performed random-effects meta-analyses of adjusted relative effects for relevant confounders of comparative studies and proportional meta-analyses to summarize frequencies from one-sample studies using R statistical software. We present the GRADE certainty of evidence from comparative studies. Findings are available on an interactive living systematic review webpage, including an updated evidence map and real-time meta-analyses customizable by subgroups and filters.

Results: We included 177 studies involving 638,791 participants from 41 countries. Among the 11 types of COVID-19 vaccines identified, the most frequently used platforms were mRNA (154 studies), viral vector (51), and inactivated virus vaccines (17). Low to very low-certainty evidence suggests that vaccination may result in minimal to no important differences compared to no vaccination in all assessed maternal and infant safety outcomes from 26 fewer to 17 more events per 1000 pregnant persons, and 13 fewer to 9 more events per 1000 neonates, respectively. We found statistically significant reductions in emergency cesarean deliveries (9%) with mRNA vaccines, and in stillbirth (75-83%) with mRNA/viral vector vaccines. Low to very low-certainty evidence suggests that vaccination during pregnancy with mRNA vaccines may reduce severe cases or hospitalizations in pregnant persons with COVID-19 (72%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 42-86), symptomatic COVID-19 (78%; 95% CI 21-94), and virologically confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (82%; 95% CI 39-95). Reductions were lower with other vaccine types and during Omicron variant dominance than Alpha and Delta dominance. Infants also presented with fewer severe cases or hospitalizations due to COVID-19 and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (64%; 95% CI 37-80 and 66%; 95% CI 37-81, respectively).

Conclusions: We found a large body of evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy. While the certainty of evidence is not high, it stands as the most reliable option available, given the current absence of pregnant individuals in clinical trials. Results are shared in near real time in an accessible and interactive format for scientists, decision makers, clinicians, and the general public. This living systematic review highlights the relevance of continuous vaccine safety and effectiveness monitoring, particularly in at-risk populations for COVID-19 impact such as pregnant persons, during the introduction of new vaccines.

Clinical trial registration: PROSPERO: CRD42021281290.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Agustín Ciapponi, Mabel Berrueta, Fernando J. Argento, Jamile Ballivian, Ariel Bardach, Martin E. Brizuela, Noelia Castellana, Daniel Comandé, Sami Gottlieb, Beate Kampmann, Agustina Mazzoni, Edward P.K. Parker, Juan M. Sambade, Katharina Stegelmann, Xu Xiong, Andy Stergachis, and Pierre Buekens have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Evidence map
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Adjusted risk of stillbirth associated with COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy versus unvaccinated pregnant population, by trimester of exposure. A Alpha, CI confidence interval, D Delta, DV dominant variant, G good, GQ global quality, NS not specified, O Omicron, VT vaccine type, VV viral vector
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Pooled proportion of stillbirth in vaccinated pregnant population per 1000 patients by trimester of exposure. CI confidence interval
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination compared to no vaccination during pregnancy, by vaccine type: severe or hospitalized maternal COVID-19. Global quality (GQ): Fair (F), Good (G); Vaccine type (VT): Inactivated virus (IV), Ribonucleic acid (RNA), Viral vector (VV), Not specified (NS); Vaccination status (VS): Complete (C), Booster (B); Trimester (Trim): 1 (1st), 2 (2nd), 3 (3rd), Not specified (NS); Dominant variant (DV): Alpha (A), Delta (D), Omicron (O), Not specified (NS)

References

    1. WHO coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboard. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/. Accessed 20 Apr 2024.
    1. World Health Organization, Others. WHO SAGE roadmap for prioritizing uses of COVID-19 vaccines in the context of limited supply: an approach to inform planning and subsequent recommendations based on epidemiological setting and vaccine supply scenarios, first issued 20 October 2020, latest update 16 July 2021. World Health Organization; 2021. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/342917. Accessed 20 Apr 2024.
    1. COVID-19 vaccines. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/covid-19.... Accessed 20 Apr 2024.
    1. World Health Organization. WHO SAGE roadmap for prioritizing uses of COVID-19 vaccines: an approach to optimize the global impact of COVID-19 vaccines, based on public health goals, global and national equity, and vaccine access and coverage scenarios. Updated 10 November 2023. World Health Organization; 2023. Report No.: WHO/2019-nCoV/Vaccines/SAGE/Prioritization/2022.1. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-Vaccines-SAGE-Prio.... Accessed 20 Apr 2024.
    1. WHO. COVID-19 vaccine tracker and landscape. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/draft-landscape-of-covid-19-cand.... Accessed 20 Apr 2024.

Substances

LinkOut - more resources