Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jul 15;55(1):88.
doi: 10.1186/s13567-024-01347-1.

Fish Iridoviridae: infection, vaccination and immune response

Affiliations
Review

Fish Iridoviridae: infection, vaccination and immune response

Rocío Leiva-Rebollo et al. Vet Res. .

Abstract

Each year, due to climate change, an increasing number of new pathogens are being discovered and studied, leading to an increase in the number of known diseases affecting various fish species in different regions of the world. Viruses from the family Iridoviridae, which consist of the genera Megalocytivirus, Lymphocystivirus, and Ranavirus, cause epizootic outbreaks in farmed and wild, marine, and freshwater fish species (including ornamental fish). Diseases caused by fish viruses of the family Iridoviridae have a significant economic impact, especially in the aquaculture sector. Consequently, vaccines have been developed in recent decades, and their administration methods have improved. To date, various types of vaccines are available to control and prevent Iridoviridae infections in fish populations. Notably, two vaccines, specifically targeting Red Sea bream iridoviral disease and iridoviruses (formalin-killed vaccine and AQUAVAC® IridoV, respectively), are commercially available. In addition to exploring these themes, this review examines the immune responses in fish following viral infections or vaccination procedures. In general, the evasion mechanisms observed in iridovirus infections are characterised by a systemic absence of inflammatory responses and a reduction in the expression of genes associated with the adaptive immune response. Finally, this review also explores prophylactic procedure trends in fish vaccination strategies, focusing on future advances in the field.

Keywords: Fish Iridoviridae; aquaculture; immune response; vaccines; viral infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Valero Y, Cuesta A. Reassortant viruses threatening fish aquaculture. Rev Aquacult. 2023;15:1720–1731. doi: 10.1111/raq.12813. - DOI
    1. Mugimba KK, Byarugaba DK, Mutoloki S, Evensen Ø, Munang’andu HM. Challenges and solutions to viral disease of finfish in marine aquaculture. Pathogens. 2021;9:673. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10060673. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Du Y, Hu X, Miao L, Chen J. Current status and development prospects of aquatic vaccines. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1040336. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1040336. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Długosz E, Wesołowska A. Immune response of the host and vaccine development. Pathogens. 2023;12:637. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12050637. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sakai M. Current research status of fish immunostimulants. Aquaculture. 1999;172:63–92. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00436-0. - DOI

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources