Treatment of Iron-Induced Cutaneous Hyperpigmentation With Energy-Based Devices

Abstract

Objectives: Iatrogenic cutaneous siderosis is a well-recognized dermatologic complication after parenteral iron infusion. The condition manifests as discrete, hyperpigmented patches near the site of injection. Most cases do not resolve spontaneously, leading to significant aesthetic and psychological distress to patients. A recent case of iatrogenic cutaneous siderosis at our institution prompted a systematic review of the efficacy of energy-based devices previously reported in the treatment of this condition.

Methods: PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched for all peer-reviewed articles published using the following search terms: "iron OR heme OR hemosiderosis OR siderosis" and "hyperpigmentation OR staining OR tattoo." Articles reporting on energy-based devices in the treatment of iron-induced hyperpigmentation were included.

Results: A total of seven articles and 54 total patients were included in this review. All patients, including the patient treated at our institution, were female, with an average age of 44 years. Hyperpigmentation was most commonly associated with intravenous iron infusion (48/54, 89%), on the arm or forearm (44/54, 81%), and used for the treatment of underlying iron deficiency anemia (54/54, 100%). The application of six different nanosecond or picosecond quality-switched laser systems was reported in the treatment of cutaneous siderosis, with wavelengths ranging from 532 to 1064 nm. Spot sizes varied between 2 and 7 mm, with energy fluences spanning 0.5-40 J/cm² depending on both the device and spot size. Outcomes were measured after an average of 5.4 laser treatments and 10.4 months, with over half of all reported patients experiencing complete clearance (27/50, 54%). Our patient received treatment in three test areas with picosecond alexandrite 785 nm, nanosecond Nd:YAG 532 nm, and picosecond Nd:YAG 532 nm devices. The nanosecond Nd:YAG 532 nm treated area demonstrated the greatest improvement, and the entire arm was subsequently treated with this device.

Conclusions: Despite the often intractable nature of iatrogenic cutaneous siderosis, laser surgery is a reasonable and safe treatment modality for patients seeking cosmetic improvement of this dyschromia. Dermatologists should be aware of this entity and the efficacy of the energy-based devices currently in our armamentarium. A combination approach may need to be utilized with different wavelengths and pulsed widths to target iron pigment in both dermal and subcutaneous layers.

Keywords: devices; energy‐based; hemosiderosis; hyperpigmentation; iron; laser; quality switched; siderosis.