Long-term penile prosthesis couple's satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 39010798
- DOI: 10.1111/andr.13696
Long-term penile prosthesis couple's satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Context: Data supporting successful and satisfactory penile prosthesis (PP) implantation outcomes are mainly based on subjective, rather than objective, analysis.
Objective: To systematically review and objectively analyze, all available data related to patient and partner PP satisfaction.
Evidence acquisition: An extensive search was performed, including the following key-words: ("penile prosthesis" and "satisfaction"). The search, which accrued data from January 1, 1969, up to July 31, 2023, was restricted to English-language articles including human participants.
Evidence synthesis: Out of 663 retrieved articles, 83 were considered including, 12,132 subjects with a mean age and mean follow-up of 58.6 [range 20; 77.1] years and 47.6 [range 6; 374] months, respectively. Overall, a high patient satisfaction rate was observed 83[80; 86]%. The satisfaction rate increased in subjects with three-piece PP and in those with a higher rate of cardiovascular or neurological diseases and was independent of the patient's age. Partner's satisfaction rate was lower when compared to that observed in men and it increased according to the use of inflatable devices and the presence of patient Peyronie's disease. The long-term complication rate was limited ranging from 3% for erosion to 4.6% when mechanical failure was considered.
Conclusions: Patient and partner satisfaction is excellent and increases with time. The number of complications is limited and is strongly associated with the presence of diabetes mellitus.
Patient summary: We found a high couple satisfaction score that was higher when reported by males compared to females. Patient satisfaction increased with time, and it was independent of age.
Keywords: Peyronie's diseases; erectile dysfunction; penile prosthesis; satisfaction.
© 2024 American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Corona G, Cucinotta D, Di Lorenzo G, et al. The Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS), along with ten other Italian Scientific Societies, guidelines on the diagnosis and management of erectile dysfunction. J Endocrinol Invest. 2023;46(6):1241‐1274. doi:10.1007/s40618‐023‐02015‐5
-
- Salonia A, Bettocchi C, Boeri L, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Sexual and Reproductive Health‐2021 Update: male sexual dysfunction. Eur Urol. 2021;80(3):333‐357. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2021.06.007
-
- Osmonov D, Christopher AN, Blecher GA, et al. Clinical Recommendations From the European Society for sexual medicine exploring partner expectations, satisfaction in male and phalloplasty cohorts, the impact of penile length, girth and implant type, reservoir placement, and the influence of comorbidities and social circumstances. J Sex Med. 2020;17(2):210‐237. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.10.016
-
- Barton GJ, Carlos EC, Lentz AC. Sexual quality of life and satisfaction with penile prostheses. Sex Med Rev. 2019;7(1):178‐188. doi:10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.10.003
-
- Trost LW, McCaslin R, Linder B, Hellstrom WJ. Long‐term outcomes of penile prostheses for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013;10(3):353‐366. doi:10.1586/erd.12.92
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous