Non-surgical retreatment versus papillary preservation flap surgery for residual pockets: A randomized controlled trial with clinical and patient-reported outcomes
- PMID: 39011585
- DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.14047
Non-surgical retreatment versus papillary preservation flap surgery for residual pockets: A randomized controlled trial with clinical and patient-reported outcomes
Abstract
Aim: To compare the efficacy of non-surgical re-instrumentation (NSR) and papillary preservation flap (PPF) surgery at single-rooted teeth with residual pockets.
Materials and methods: Patients with at least a residual pocket depth (PD ≥ 5 mm) after Steps I and II were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive NSR or PPF surgery. The primary outcome was PD reduction, and secondary outcomes were clinical attachment level (CAL) change and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Outcome variables were measured at baseline, 3 and 6 months. The examiner was blinded. Statistical analysis, one site for each patient, included descriptive statistics and analysis of covariance.
Results: Forty-six participants were enrolled, and one patient dropped out in the PPF group. After 6 months, both treatments resulted in significant PD reduction (1.3 ± 1.2 mm, p = .009 NSR; 2.0 ± 0.7 mm, p < .001 PPF) and CAL gain (1.0 ± 2.4 mm, p = .031 NSR; 1.4 ± 0.8 mm, p < .001 PPF). PD reduction between groups was not statistically significant (diff: 0.6 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI] [-0.3 to 1.5]; p = .167). Pocket closure was 61% NSR versus 86% PPF (p = .091). Smoking was associated with less PD reduction of almost 1 mm in both treatments. Treatment time was longer for PPF surgery, but PROMs and post-operative pain were similar between groups.
Conclusions: Both NSR and PPF reduced PD without significant difference between treatments at 6 months. PPF surgery may offer faster PD reduction, but smoking habits reduce treatment efficacy.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05460988.
Keywords: RCT; Step III; non‐surgical re‐instrumentation; papillary preservation flap; patient‐reported outcomes; residual periodontal pockets.
© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Aimetti, M., Romano, F., Torta, I., Cirillo, D., Caposio, P., & Romagnoli, R. (2004). Debridement and local application of tetracycline‐loaded fibres in the management of persistent periodontitis: Results after 12 months. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 31(3), 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0303-6979.2004.00457.x
-
- Badersten, A., Nilveus, R., & Egelberg, J. (1984). Effect of nonsurgical periodontal therapy. III. Single versus repeated instrumentation. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 11(2), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1984.tb00839.x
-
- Barbato, L., Selvaggi, F., Kalemaj, Z., Buti, J., Bendinelli, E., Marca, M., & Cairo, F. (2020). Clinical efficacy of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) and non‐surgical (MINST) treatments of periodontal intra‐bony defect. A systematic review and network meta‐analysis of RCT's. Clinical Oral Investigation, 24(3), 1125–1135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03229-0
-
- Caffesse, R. G., Sweeney, P. L., & Smith, B. A. (1986). Scaling and root planing with and without periodontal flap surgery. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 13(3), 205–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1986.tb01461.x
-
- Cairo, F., Cortellini, P., Nieri, M., Pilloni, A., Barbato, L., Pagavino, G., & Tonetti, M. (2020). Coronally advanced flap and composite restoration of the enamel with or without connective tissue graft for the treatment of single maxillary gingival recession with non‐carious cervical lesion. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 47(3), 362–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13229
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
