Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Jul 1;8(4):pkae058.
doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae058.

Effect of resistance training on physical function during chemotherapy in colon cancer

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of resistance training on physical function during chemotherapy in colon cancer

Justin C Brown et al. JNCI Cancer Spectr. .

Abstract

Background: The decline of physical function during chemotherapy predicts poor quality of life and premature death. It is unknown if resistance training prevents physical function decline during chemotherapy in colon cancer survivors.

Methods: This multicenter trial randomly assigned 181 colon cancer survivors receiving postoperative chemotherapy to home-based resistance training or usual care control. Physical function outcomes included the short physical performance battery, isometric handgrip strength, and the physical function subscale of the Medical Outcomes Short-Form 36-item questionnaire. Mixed models for repeated measures quantified estimated treatment differences.

Results: At baseline, participants had a mean (SD) age of 55.2 (12.8) years; 67 (37%) were 60 years or older, and 29 (16%) had a composite short physical performance battery score of no more than 9. Compared with usual care control, resistance training did not improve the composite short physical performance battery score (estimated treatment difference = -0.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.32 to 0.31; P = .98) or the short physical performance battery scores for balance (estimated treatment difference = 0.01, 95% CI = -0.10 to 0.11; P = .93), gait speed (estimated treatment difference = 0.08, 95% CI = -0.06 to 0.22; P = .28), and sit-to-stand (estimated treatment difference = -0.08, 95% CI = -0.29 to 0.13; P = .46). Compared with usual care control, resistance training did not improve isometric handgrip strength (estimated treatment difference = 1.50 kg, 95% CI = -1.06 to 4.05; P = .25) or self-reported physical function (estimated treatment difference = -3.55, 95% CI = -10.03 to 2.94); P = .28). The baseline short physical performance battery balance score (r = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.35) and handgrip strength (r = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.09 to 0.36) correlated with chemotherapy relative dose intensity.

Conclusion: Among colon cancer survivors with relatively high physical functioning, random assignment to home-based resistance training did not prevent physical function decline during chemotherapy.

Clinical trial registration: NCT03291951.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr Brown is supported by R00CA218603, R01CA270274, U01CA271279, and OT2CA278684. Dr Brown reports receiving consulting fees from Novo Nordisk A/S. Dr Meyerhardt is supported by the Douglas Gray Woodruff Chair fund, the Guo Shu Shi Fund, the Project P fund, Anonymous Family Fund for Innovations in Colorectal Cancer, and the George Stone Family Foundation. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow of participants and ascertainment of physical function endpoints by randomly assigned group.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Correlational analyses of physical functioning outcomes at baseline (top panel) and change from baseline to end of chemotherapy (bottom panel) with chemotherapy relative dose intensity and the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. *P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001. GS = gait speed; HG = handgrip; PRO-CTCAE = Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; SF-36 = Short Form–36; RDI = relative dose intensity; SPPB = short physical performance battery; STS = sit to stand.

References

    1. Petrick JL, Reeve BB, Kucharska-Newton AM, et al. Functional status declines among cancer survivors: trajectory and contributing factors. J Geriatr Oncol. 2014;5(4):359-367. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scheepers ERM, Vink GR, Schiphorst AHW, et al. The impact of surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy on health-related quality of life in patients with colon cancer: Changes at group level versus individual level. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022;31(6):e13691. - PubMed
    1. Kluetz PG, Slagle A, Papadopoulos EJ, et al. Focusing on core patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials: symptomatic adverse events, physical function, and disease-related symptoms. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(7):1553-1558. - PubMed
    1. Quinten C, Coens C, Mauer M, et al. ; EORTC Clinical Groups. Baseline quality of life as a prognostic indicator of survival: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from EORTC clinical trials. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(9):865-871. - PubMed
    1. Hurria A, Togawa K, Mohile SG, et al. Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(25):3457-3465. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources