Age Differences in Electronic Mental Health Literacy: Qualitative Study
- PMID: 39012686
- PMCID: PMC11289580
- DOI: 10.2196/59131
Age Differences in Electronic Mental Health Literacy: Qualitative Study
Abstract
Background: Electronic mental health literacy (eMHL) is critical for accessing and effectively using digital mental health resources. However, there is a paucity of research on how eMHL varies across age groups.
Objective: This study aimed to investigate differences in eMHL among young, middle-aged, and older adults; provide insights into the needs, behaviors, and attitudes of different age groups in relation to digital mental health resources; and ultimately, inform the improvement of mental health services.
Methods: A qualitative investigation was conducted to examine the differences in eMHL across different age demographics in the Chinese population in 2023. The study sample comprised 3 distinct age groups: 18-34 years, 35-64 years, and 65 years and older. Participants were recruited through purposive sampling to ensure a diverse representation of the population. Data were collected through semistructured one-on-one interviews, which allowed for in-depth exploration of individual experiences and perceptions. The gathered data were subsequently subjected to rigorous thematic analysis to enable the identification and interpretation of recurring patterns and themes.
Results: The principal outcomes derived from these interviews were synthesized into 5 distinct dimensions: emotional needs, use of digital mental health resources, assessment of digital mental health information, engagement with social media to regulate emotions, and coping strategies. These dimensions were uniformly observed across the 3 age groups.
Conclusions: We identified differences in knowledge, skills, and attitudes regarding the use of web-based information for managing mental health problems between the 3 age groups. The findings highlight the importance of age-specific strategies for improving eMHL.
Keywords: age-related difference; eHealth literacy; eMHL; electronic mental health literacy; mental health; mental health literacy.
©Richard Huan Xu, Lidan Tian, Liling Zhu, Yuan Cao, Sherry Kit-wa Chan, Dong Dong, Wai-ling Annie Cheung, Eliza Lai-yi Wong. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 16.07.2024.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
References
-
- Lipson SK, Lattie EG, Eisenberg D. Increased rates of mental health service utilization by U.S. college students: 10-year population-level trends (2007-2017) Psychiatr Serv. 2019;70(1):60–63. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800332. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/30394183 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Pretorius C, Coyle D. Young people's use of digital tools to support their mental health during Covid-19 restrictions. Front Digit Health. 2021;3:763876. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.763876. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/34927133 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Wies B, Landers C, Ienca M. Digital mental health for young people: a scoping review of ethical promises and challenges. Front Digit Health. 2021;3:697072. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.697072. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/34713173 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Mata-Greve F, Johnson M, Pullmann MD, Friedman EC, Griffith Fillipo I, Comtois KA, Arean P. Mental health and the perceived usability of digital mental health tools among essential workers and people unemployed due to COVID-19: cross-sectional survey study. JMIR Ment Health. 2021;8(8):e28360. doi: 10.2196/28360. https://mental.jmir.org/2021/8/e28360/ v8i8e28360 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical