Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 16;14(7):e084313.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084313.

Protect peripheral intravenous catheters: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a novel antimicrobial dressing for peripheral intravenous catheters (ProP trial)

Affiliations

Protect peripheral intravenous catheters: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a novel antimicrobial dressing for peripheral intravenous catheters (ProP trial)

Claire M Rickard et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) are the most commonly used vascular access device in hospitalised patients. Yet PIVCs may be complicated by local or systemic infections leading to increased healthcare costs. Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)-impregnated dressings may help reduce PIVC-related infectious complications but have not yet been evaluated. We hypothesise an impregnated CHG transparent dressing, in comparison to standard polyurethane dressing, will be safe, effective and cost-effective in protecting against PIVC-related infectious complications and phlebitis.

Methods and analysis: The ProP trial is a multicentre, superiority, randomised clinical and cost-effectiveness trial with internal pilot, conducted across three centres in Australia and France. Patients (adults and children aged ≥6 years) requiring one PIVC for ≥48 hours are eligible. We will exclude patients with emergent PIVCs, known CHG allergy, skin injury at site of insertion or previous trial enrolment. Patients will be randomised to 3M Tegaderm Antimicrobial IV Advanced Securement dressing or standard care group. For the internal pilot, 300 patients will be enrolled to test protocol feasibility (eligibility, recruitment, retention, protocol fidelity, missing data and satisfaction of participants and staff), primary endpoint for internal pilot, assessed by independent data safety monitoring committee. Clinical outcomes will not be reviewed. Following feasibility assessment, the remaining 2624 (1312 per trial arm) patients will be enrolled following the same methods. The primary endpoint is a composite of catheter-related infectious complications and phlebitis. Recruitment began on 3 May 2023.

Ethics and dissemination: The protocol was approved by Ouest I ethic committee in France and by The Queensland Children's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee in Australia. The findings will be disseminated through presentation at scientific conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals.

Trial registration number: NCT05741866.

Keywords: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Health economics; Infection control; Nursing Care; Quality in health care; Safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: CMR’s employer (The University of Queensland or Griffith University) has received unrestricted research grants on her behalf from BD, Cardinal Health, Eloquest and consultancy payments from 3M, BD, BBraun, and ITL Biomedical. AU’s employer (The University of Queensland or Griffith University) has received unrestricted research grants or consultancies on her behalf from BD, 3M, Sterile Care and Medline. NMM— Griffith University and The University of Queensland have received on her behalf investigator-initiated research grants or consultancies from Cardinal Health, 3M, Eloquest, Medline and Becton Dickinson. AC has received unrestricted investigator-initiated research grants, paid to her employer (Griffith University), from Cardinal Health, 3 M and Eloquest. TMK’s employer (The University of Queensland or Griffith University) has received unrestricted research grants on her behalf from BD, and consultancy payments from 3M, BD, BBraun, Medical Specialties Australia, and Smiths Medical. OM, BD and JG received funding for congress attendance, and research funding from Becton Dickinson and 3M. JB’s employer (Griffith University) has received unrestricted research grants on his behalf from BD and Navi Technologies, and consultancy payments from 3M, and BD. COB has no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Alexandrou E, Ray‐Barruel G, Carr PJ, et al. Use of short peripheral intravenous catheters: characteristics, management, and outcomes worldwide. J Hosp Med. 2018;13 doi: 10.12788/jhm.3039. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maki DG, Kluger DM, Crnich CJ. The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different Intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:1159–71. doi: 10.4065/81.9.1159. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marsh N, Webster J, Larson E, et al. Observational study of peripheral intravenous catheter outcomes in adult hospitalized patients: a multivariable analysis of peripheral intravenous catheter failure. J Hosp Med. 2018;13:83–9. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2867. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marsh N, Webster J, Mihala G, et al. Devices and dressings to secure peripheral venous catheters to prevent complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015:CD011070. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011070.pub2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rickard CM, Ray-Barruel G. Peripheral intravenous catheter assessment: beyond phlebitis. Lancet Haematol. 2017;4:e402–3. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30145-X. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources