Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 1;160(9):936-944.
doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.2192.

Systemic Immunomodulatory Treatments for Atopic Dermatitis: Living Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Update

Affiliations

Systemic Immunomodulatory Treatments for Atopic Dermatitis: Living Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Update

Aaron M Drucker et al. JAMA Dermatol. .

Erratum in

  • Error in Studies Included.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA Dermatol. 2024 Sep 1;160(9):1012. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3600. JAMA Dermatol. 2024. PMID: 39292474 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Importance: There are multiple approved systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis. Lebrikizumab is a newly licensed biologic medication that has been compared to placebo in clinical trials but not to other systemic treatments.

Objective: To compare reported measures of efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab to other systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis in a living systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Data sources: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, the Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database, the Global Resource of Eczema Trials database, and trial registries were searched from inception through November 3, 2023.

Study selection: Randomized clinical trials evaluating 8 or more weeks of treatment with systemic immunomodulatory medications for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened in duplicate.

Data extraction and synthesis: Data were abstracted in duplicate and random-effects bayesian network meta-analyses were performed. Minimal important differences were used to define important differences between medications. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). The updated analysis was completed from December 13, 2023, to February 20, 2024.

Main outcome measures: Efficacy outcomes were the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scales (PP-NRS) and were compared using mean difference (MD) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Safety outcomes were serious adverse events and withdrawal due to adverse events. Other outcomes included the proportion of participants with 50%, 75%, and 90% improvement in EASI (EASI-50, -75, -90) and the proportion with success on the Investigator Global Assessment compared using odds ratios with 95% CrI.

Results: The study sample included 97 eligible trials, with a total of 24 679 patients. Lebrikizumab was associated with no important difference in change in EASI (MD, -2.0; 95% CrI, -4.5 to 0.3; moderate certainty), POEM (MD, -1.1; 95% CrI -2.5 to 0.2; moderate certainty), DLQI (MD, -0.2; 95% CrI -2.1 to 1.6; moderate certainty), or PP-NRS (MD, 0.1; 95% CrI -0.4, 0.6; high certainty) compared to dupilumab among adults with atopic dermatitis who were treated for up to 16 weeks. Dupilumab was associated with higher odds of efficacy in binary outcomes compared with lebrikizumab. The relative efficacy of other approved systemic medications was similar to that found by previous updates of this living study, with high-dose upadacitinib and abrocitinib demonstrating numerically highest relative efficacy. For safety outcomes, low event rates limited useful comparisons.

Conclusions and relevance: In this living systematic review and network meta-analysis, lebrikizumab was similarly effective to dupilumab for the short-term treatment of atopic dermatitis in adults. Clinicians and patients can use these comparative data to inform treatment decisions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Drucker reported compensation from the British Journal of Dermatology, the American Academy of Dermatology, and Canadian Dermatology Today; consulting fees from the US National Eczema Association and the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; research grants to his institution from the National Eczema Association, the Eczema Society of Canada, the Canadian Dermatology Foundation, Canadian Institutes for Health Research, US National Institutes of Health, and the Physicians Services Incorporated Foundation, all outside of the submitted work. Dr Ellis reported personal fees from Stratevi, a health care consultancy that receives financial compensation from numerous pharmaceutical companies, outside of the submitted work. Dr Spuls reported departmental independent research grants from Pharma; being the chief investigator of the systemic and phototherapy atopic eczema registry (TREAT NL/BE) for adults and children, the principal investigator for a study of methotrexate vs azathioprine, project lead of the governmental funded UPDATE trial, and being involved in performing clinical trials with many pharmaceutical industries that manufacture drugs used for atopic dermatitis for which financial compensation is paid to the department or hospital; being involved in the development of a HOME core outcome instrument (Recap of atopic eczema), and the Outcome Measures for Vascular Malformations questionnaire, all outside the submitted work. Dr Schmitt reported institutional research grants from the German Federal Joint Committee, the German Ministry of Health, the German Ministry of Research, the European Union, the German Federal State of Saxony, Novartis, Sanofi, ALK, and Pfizer and consulting/advisory fees from Sanofi, Lilly, and ALK, all outside the submitted work. Dr Flohr reported being a section editor at the British Journal of Dermatology; research grants from Pfizer and Sanofi; speaking fees from Almirall, AbbVie, and Sanofi; and personal fees for involvement with the European treatment guideline for atopic dermatitis, all outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Study Screening and Selection Process for the Living Systematic Review of Systemic Immunomodulatory Treatments for Atopic Dermatitis, Including Results Up to the November 3, 2023 Search
aMost recent published PRISMA diagram was published by Drucker et al.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Network Meta-Analysis Results of Adultsa Treated for Between 8 and 16 Weeks for Change in Eczema Area And Severity Index (EASI) and Change in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM)
Results are presented as mean difference (MD) with 95% credible intervals (CrI) for selected currently available targeted medications vs dupilumab. MDs greater than 0 indicate that the comparator is associated with more improvement than dupilumab. MDs less than 0 indicate that the comparator is associated with less improvement than dupilumab. Results for the complete networks are available on request. OD indicates once daily and q2w, every 2 weeks. aSome studies included in the analyses of trials of adults include a minority proportion of adolescent (12-17 years old) participants.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Network Meta-Analysis Results of Adultsa Treated for 8 to 16 Weeks for Changes in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and in Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scales (PP-NRS)
Results are presented as mean difference (MD) with 95% credible intervals (CrI) for selected currently available targeted medications vs dupilumab. MDs >0 indicate that the comparator is associated with more improvement than dupilumab. MDs <0 indicate that the comparator is associated with less improvement than dupilumab. Results for the complete networks are available upon request. OD indicates once daily and q2w, every 2 weeks. aSome studies included in the analyses of trials of adults include a minority proportion of adolescent (12-17 years old) participants.

References

    1. Drucker AM, Ellis A, Jabbar-Lopez Z, et al. . Systemic immunomodulatory treatments for atopic dermatitis: protocol for a systematic review with network meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2018;8(8):e023061. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023061 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drucker AM, Ellis AG, Bohdanowicz M, et al. . Systemic immunomodulatory treatments for patients with atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156(6):659-667. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.0796 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drucker AM, Morra DE, Prieto-Merino D, et al. . Systemic immunomodulatory treatments for atopic dermatitis: update of a living systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2022;158(5):523-532. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.0455 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drucker AM, Lam M, Elsawi R, et al. . Comparing binary efficacy outcomes for systemic immunomodulatory treatments for atopic dermatitis in a living systematic review and network meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol. 2024;190(2):184-190. doi:10.1093/bjd/ljad393 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, et al. . The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(11):777-784. doi:10.7326/M14-2385 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms