Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Sep 10;42(26):3077-3082.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00178. Epub 2024 Jul 17.

Tailored Dose-Dense Versus Standard Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Risk Early Breast Cancer: End-of-Study Results of the Randomized PANTHER Trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Tailored Dose-Dense Versus Standard Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Risk Early Breast Cancer: End-of-Study Results of the Randomized PANTHER Trial

Alexios Matikas et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.Although dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy administered once every 2 weeks leads to superior outcomes compared with standard regimens once every 3 weeks, the observed improvement is largely limited to studies using the suboptimal paclitaxel schedule once every 3 weeks as control. PANTHER is an international phase III trial which compared sequential epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel administered either once every 2 or once every 3 weeks, with tailored dosing at the dose-dense schedule according to hematologic toxicity. In this end-of-study analysis, the median follow-up was 10.3 years. Compared with standard adjuvant chemotherapy, dose-dense treatment improved breast cancer recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80 [95% CI, 0.65 to 0.98]; P = .030), event-free survival (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.65 to 0.94]; P = .009), and distant disease-free survival (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.64 to 0.98]; P = .030) while the improvement in overall survival was not statistically significant (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.65 to 1.04]; P = .109). To our knowledge, this is the first trial that confirms the benefit of a dose-dense regimen over a control regimen containing docetaxel once every 3 weeks.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00798070.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/jco/authors/author-center.

Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments).

Alexios Matikas

Honoraria: Veracyte

Speakers' Bureau: Roche, Seagen (Inst)

Research Funding: AstraZeneca (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Veracyte (Inst), MSD (Inst)

Volker Moebus

Consulting or Advisory Role: IQVIA

Richard Greil

Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Novo Nordisk (Inst), Lilly (Inst)

Honoraria: Celgene, Roche, Merck, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Sandoz, AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi

Consulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Novartis, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, MSD, Merck, Gilead Sciences, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi

Research Funding: Celgene (Inst), Merck (Inst), Takeda (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), MSD (Inst), Sandoz (Inst), Gilead Sciences (Inst), Roche (Inst), Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH (Inst), AbbVie

Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Amgen, Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, Novartis, MSD, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Daiichi Sankyo

Günther G. Steger

Honoraria: Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis, Roche, AstraZeneca/Daiichi Sankyo, Teva

Consulting or Advisory Role: Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis

Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Teva

Michael Untch

Honoraria: AstraZeneca (Inst), Daiji Sankyo (Inst), Roche Pharma AG (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Pierre Fabre (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), Agendia (Inst), Art tempi (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Eisai Europe (Inst), Gilead Sciences (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Seagen (Inst), Baxter (Inst), AstraZeneca

Consulting or Advisory Role: Amgen (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Novartis (Inst), MSD Oncology (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Roche Pharma AG (Inst), Agendia (Inst), Pierre Fabre (Inst), Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH (Inst), Novartis (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Myriad Genetics (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), Art tempi (Inst), Gilead Sciences (Inst), Sanofi Aventis GmbH (Inst), Medac (Inst), Stemline Therapeutics

Tommy Fornander

Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Pfizer

Per Malmström

Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Participation in royalty sharing agreements PFS Genomics United States

Sabine Schmatloch

Other Relationship: Roche Pharma AG

Michael Gnant

Employment: Sandoz

Honoraria: Novartis, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Pierre Fabre, MSD, Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, EPG Health, Menarini

Consulting or Advisory Role: Daiichi-Sankyo, Veracyte, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Menarini, MSD Oncology, Novartis

Expert Testimony: Veracyte, Lilly

Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Novartis, Lilly

Other Relationship: ABCSG GmbH, ABCSG Research Services GmbH

Sibylle Loibl

Consulting or Advisory Role: Pfizer (Inst), Roche (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Seagen (Inst), Celgene (Inst), Lilly (Inst), AstraZeneca/MedImmune (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Merck KGaA (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Daiichi Sankyo (Inst), Pierre Fabre (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), EirGenix (Inst), Eisai Europe (Inst), Relay Therapeutics (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), Olema Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Menarini Group (Inst), MSD Oncology (Inst)

Speakers' Bureau: AstraZeneca (Inst), Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Roche (Inst), Gilead Sciences (Inst), Seagen (Inst)

Research Funding: AbbVie (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Celgene (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Roche (Inst), Daiichi Sankyo (Inst), Gilead Sciences (Inst), MolecularHealth (Inst), Menarini Group (Inst)

Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patent Pending EP14153692.0 (Inst), Patent Pending EP21152186.9 (Inst), Patent Issued EP15702464.7 (Inst), Patent Pending EP19808852.8 (Inst), Digital Ki67 Evaluator, VM Scope GmbH (Inst)

Theodoros Foukakis

Honoraria: UpToDate

Consulting or Advisory Role: Roche (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Gilead Sciences (Inst)

Research Funding: AstraZeneca (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Veracyte (Inst)

Jonas Bergh

Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Stratipath AB

Honoraria: Roche, AstraZeneca

Research Funding: Amgen (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Bayer (Inst), Merck (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Roche (Inst), Sanofi (Inst)

Other Relationship: UpToDate

No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Cumulative incidence curves of efficacy end points in the intention-to-treat population. Cumulative incidence curves and 10-year event rates for breast cancer (A) relapse-free survival events, (B) event-free survival events, (C) distant disease-free survival events, and (D) overall survival events. Log-rank test refers to comparisons of crude, unadjusted event rates. D, docetaxel; EC, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide; FEC, fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide; tDD, tailored dose dense.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Subgroup analysis of breast cancer-free survival events. The size of each box is proportional to the size of the respective subgroup. Hormone receptor–positive includes estrogen receptor– and/or progesterone receptor–positive patients; hormone receptor–negative includes estrogen and progesterone receptor–negative patients. D, docetaxel; EC, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide; FEC, fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hazard ratio; tDD, tailored dose dense.

Comment in

References

    1. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group EBCTCG : Increasing the dose intensity of chemotherapy by more frequent administration or sequential scheduling: A patient-level meta-analysis of 37 298 women with early breast cancer in 26 randomised trials. Lancet 393:1440-1452, 2019 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Del Mastro L, De Placido S, Bruzzi P, et al. : Fluorouracil and dose-dense chemotherapy in adjuvant treatment of patients with early-stage breast cancer: An open-label, 2×2 factorial, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet 385:1863-1872, 2015 - PubMed
    1. Citron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, et al. : Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: First report of intergroup trial C9741/cancer and leukemia group B trial 9741. J Clin Oncol 21:1431-1439, 2003 - PubMed
    1. Sparano JA, Zhao F, Martino S, et al. : Long-term follow-up of the E1199 phase III trial evaluating the role of taxane and schedule in operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 33:2353-2360, 2015 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Foukakis T, von Minckwitz G, Bengtsson NO, et al. : Effect of tailored dose-dense chemotherapy vs standard 3-weekly adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence-free survival among women with high-risk early breast cancer: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 316:1888-1896, 2016 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Associated data