Accessible Ecosystem for Clinical Research (Federated Learning for Everyone): Development and Usability Study
- PMID: 39018557
- PMCID: PMC11292148
- DOI: 10.2196/55496
Accessible Ecosystem for Clinical Research (Federated Learning for Everyone): Development and Usability Study
Abstract
Background: The integrity and reliability of clinical research outcomes rely heavily on access to vast amounts of data. However, the fragmented distribution of these data across multiple institutions, along with ethical and regulatory barriers, presents significant challenges to accessing relevant data. While federated learning offers a promising solution to leverage insights from fragmented data sets, its adoption faces hurdles due to implementation complexities, scalability issues, and inclusivity challenges.
Objective: This paper introduces Federated Learning for Everyone (FL4E), an accessible framework facilitating multistakeholder collaboration in clinical research. It focuses on simplifying federated learning through an innovative ecosystem-based approach.
Methods: The "degree of federation" is a fundamental concept of FL4E, allowing for flexible integration of federated and centralized learning models. This feature provides a customizable solution by enabling users to choose the level of data decentralization based on specific health care settings or project needs, making federated learning more adaptable and efficient. By using an ecosystem-based collaborative learning strategy, FL4E encourages a comprehensive platform for managing real-world data, enhancing collaboration and knowledge sharing among its stakeholders.
Results: Evaluating FL4E's effectiveness using real-world health care data sets has highlighted its ecosystem-oriented and inclusive design. By applying hybrid models to 2 distinct analytical tasks-classification and survival analysis-within real-world settings, we have effectively measured the "degree of federation" across various contexts. These evaluations show that FL4E's hybrid models not only match the performance of fully federated models but also avoid the substantial overhead usually linked with these models. Achieving this balance greatly enhances collaborative initiatives and broadens the scope of analytical possibilities within the ecosystem.
Conclusions: FL4E represents a significant step forward in collaborative clinical research by merging the benefits of centralized and federated learning. Its modular ecosystem-based design and the "degree of federation" feature make it an inclusive, customizable framework suitable for a wide array of clinical research scenarios, promising to revolutionize the field through improved collaboration and data use. Detailed implementation and analyses are available on the associated GitHub repository.
Keywords: accessible; clinical research; design effectiveness; ecosystem; federated learning; implementation; inclusive; inclusivity; integrity; multistakeholder collaboration; real-world data; reliability.
©Ashkan Pirmani, Martijn Oldenhof, Liesbet M Peeters, Edward De Brouwer, Yves Moreau. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 17.07.2024.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: EDB is an employee of Genentech, Inc.
Figures



Similar articles
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Blockchain-Powered Healthcare Systems: Enhancing Scalability and Security with Hybrid Deep Learning.Sensors (Basel). 2023 Sep 7;23(18):7740. doi: 10.3390/s23187740. Sensors (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37765797 Free PMC article.
-
Architectural Design of a Blockchain-Enabled, Federated Learning Platform for Algorithmic Fairness in Predictive Health Care: Design Science Study.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 30;25:e46547. doi: 10.2196/46547. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 37902833 Free PMC article.
-
Learning From Others Without Sacrificing Privacy: Simulation Comparing Centralized and Federated Machine Learning on Mobile Health Data.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Mar 30;9(3):e23728. doi: 10.2196/23728. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021. PMID: 33783362 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Comprehensive Overview of IoT-Based Federated Learning: Focusing on Client Selection Methods.Sensors (Basel). 2023 Aug 17;23(16):7235. doi: 10.3390/s23167235. Sensors (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37631771 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Privacy-Preserving Glycemic Management in Type 1 Diabetes: Development and Validation of a Multiobjective Federated Reinforcement Learning Framework.JMIR Diabetes. 2025 Jul 4;10:e72874. doi: 10.2196/72874. JMIR Diabetes. 2025. PMID: 40614090 Free PMC article.
-
Personalized federated learning for predicting disability progression in multiple sclerosis using real-world routine clinical data.NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jul 24;8(1):478. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01788-8. NPJ Digit Med. 2025. PMID: 40707601 Free PMC article.
-
Addressing Challenges to Enhance Clinical Research in Portugal: Insights from the OncoT3 Expert Group Delphi Study.Cureus. 2024 Nov 15;16(11):e73720. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73720. eCollection 2024 Nov. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39677142 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sherman RE, Anderson SA, Dal Pan GJ, Gray GW, Gross T, Hunter NL, LaVange L, Marinac-Dabic D, Marks PW, Robb MA, Shuren J, Temple R, Woodcock J, Yue LQ, Califf RM. Real-world evidence - what is it and what can it tell us? N Engl J Med. 2016;375(23):2293–2297. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1609216. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, Blomberg N, Boiten J, da Silva Santos LB, Bourne PE, Bouwman J, Brookes AJ, Clark T, Crosas M, Dillo I, Dumon O, Edmunds S, Evelo CT, Finkers R, Gonzalez-Beltran A, Gray AJ, Groth P, Goble C, Grethe JS, Heringa J, 't Hoen PAC, Hooft R, Kuhn T, Kok R, Kok J, Lusher SJ, Martone ME, Mons A, Packer AL, Persson B, Rocca-Serra P, Roos M, van Schaik R, Sansone S, Schultes E, Sengstag T, Slater T, Strawn G, Swertz MA, Thompson M, van der Lei J, van Mulligen E, Velterop J, Waagmeester A, Wittenburg P, Wolstencroft K, Zhao J, Mons B. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 2016;3:160018. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18.sdata201618 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Weiskopf NG, Weng C. Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20(1):144–151. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000681. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/22733976 amiajnl-2011-000681 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources